Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
14 (
3
); 495-500
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_27_2023

Neuromodulation of spinal reflex pathway for the treatment of detrusor overactivity by medial plantar nerve stimulation at surface of sole of foot in patients with spinal cord injury

Center for Advanced Technology Enabled Rehabilitation (CATER), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore Tamil Nadu, India
Corresponding author: Rajdeep Ojha, Center for Advanced Technology Enabled Rehabilitation (CATER), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. rajdeep@cmcvellore.ac.in
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Ojha R, Singh A, George J, Chandy BR. Neuromodulation of spinal reflex pathway for the treatment of detrusor overactivity by medial plantar nerve stimulation at surface of sole of foot in patients with spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2023;14:495-500.

Abstract

Objectives:

Suprasacral spinal cord lesions are prone to have neurogenic detrusor overactivity leading to urinary incontinence. Current medical management has known side-effects and often surgical managements are irreversible. Electrical stimulation to modulate spinal reflex pathway having same nerve root as urinary bladder is reported in the literature. This study aimed to reduce detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) using surface electrical stimulation of medial plantar nerve at the sole of foot.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty adults with SCI having episode of at least 1 leak/day due to detrusor overactivity as diagnosed by cystometrogram (CMG), were on clean intermittent catheterization and ankle jerk was present consented for the study. Participants were asked to maintain bladder diary a week before and during 2 weeks of treatment. CMG was done on day-0 and day-14. cmcUroModul@tor®, an inhouse developed electrical stimulator was used for ½ h daily for period of 2 weeks. Patient satisfaction feedback questionnaire was taken on completion of treatment. CMG data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-ranked test while bladder diary was analyzed using binomial distribution. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Institutional Review Board (IRB) and ethics committee of Christian Medical College, Vellore, approved the study (CMC/IRB/11061).

Results:

Statistical significant improvement in maximum detrusor pressure (P = 0.03) and cystometric capacity (P = 0.04) was observed. Of 20 subjects, 18 showed improvement in bladder diary.

Conclusion:

Neuromodulation of medial plantar nerve at sole of foot by surface electrical stimulation is non-invasive, cost-effective, and alternative simple treatment modality for urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity.

Keywords

Detrusor overactivity
Urinary incontinence
Spinal cord injury
Neuromodulation
Surface foot stimulation
Medial plantar nerve

INTRODUCTION

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity results in high bladder pressure which may lead to urinary incontinence.[1] Urinary bladder incontinence is a stressful and depressive event for an individual with spinal cord injury (SCI) which hampers daily living activities and leads to societal withdrawal.[2] Restoration of continence was the highest felt research priorities reported by individuals with SCI.[3-5] The current medical management of detrusor overactivity includes use of anticholinergic drugs along with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and often surgical managements are irreversible.[6,7] Long-term usage of anticholinergics is known to cause side-effects such as blurring of vision, dryness of mouth, cognitive impairment, and dementia.[8] Modulation of sacral reflex arc using electrical stimulation is an alternative approach. Several studies, including the one conducted at our center, have reported stimulation of sacral somatic nerves such as tibial nerve, pudendal nerve, or its branches, had improved continence after few weeks of treatment.[9-11]

Our previous work demonstrated that after 2 weeks of surface electrical stimulation of posterior tibial nerve, there was improvement in bladder capacity and reduction in number of leaks as reported in bladder diary.[1,9] This study is continuation of our research in this area. We report our findings on foot surface stimulation of medial plantar nerve for reducing detrusor overactivity by modulating of spinal reflex pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This interventional trial was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) and ethics committee of Christian Medical College Vellore (CMC/IRB/11061). Twenty adults with SCI meeting inclusion criteria consented for the study. This study met the regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Adults with SCI having at least one episode of leak/day, on CIC, presence of ankle jerk, and Cystometrogram (CMG) proven detrusor overactivity, were recruited. Ankle jerk confirmed spinal reflex loop arc’s integrity to tibial nerve. The key exclusion criteria were patients with peripheral neuropathy, recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), mental illness, stress-related incontinence, pregnant women, and presence of implantable devices.

Medications related to treatment of detrusor overactivity were withheld 1 week before and during stimulation period (i.e., total 21 days). Start and end of stimulation were considered day-1 and 14, respectively, while days before the treatment were considered from − 7th to 0th day. Participants maintained bladder diary for all 21 days. Participants were advised for 4-hourly CIC. Bladder diary had columns for entering urine output, record of leaks, and fluid intake in a day. Demographic details were recorded on day-0.

CMG was performed using commercially available machine, on day-0 and day-15. Stimulation was given using a custom-built nerve stimulator, cmcUroModul@tor®. The parameters for stimulation were same as our earlier study.[1,9] The current strength was chosen based on plantarflexion of ankle and or maximum current tolerated by a person.

Electrical stimulation was given using self-adhesive gel electrodes (3.5 × 2 inch2) wherein the cathode was positioned at the medial arch of foot over medial plantar nerve while placement of anode was at metatarsophalangeal joint approximately 2 cm apart from cathode [Figure 1]. The electrical stimulator was given for ½ h daily for period of 2 weeks.

Figure 1:
Stimulation site with cmcUroModul@tor.

Analysis of data from bladder diary

The parameters obtained from the bladder diary were categorized into five categories: (1) Number of leaks in a day, (2) maximum urine output in a day, (3) total fluid intake in a day, (4) total volume of urine voided in a day, and (5) number of CIC. Trend lines were drawn for bladder diary parameters and were analyzed for −7th to 14th day for each patient. Reduction in frequency of leaks, increased volume of urine voided, increased fluid intake, and increased maximum urine voided in a day were marked as an improvement. Participants with no significant change in these parameters were put into no-change category. At the same-time, those with an increased tendency in frequency of leaks or a decrease in fluid intake or a decrease in maximum volume of urine passed or reduction in urine voided in a day were marked as deteriorated state of urinary bladder. The minimum number of CIC advised per day was six, that is, 4-hourly. Decrease in number of CIC was marked as an improvement, while an increase in CIC was marked as a deteriorated state of bladder. The bladder diary of a subject who developed UTI while undergoing study period was excluded from analysis for the days which he was clinically managed for UTI and was given additional 1 week of stimulation with no change in stimulation protocol. A binomial distribution test with 50% test proportion was used to compare between improved and not improved population.

Analysis of data from CMG

Pre- and post-parameters obtained from CMG procedure (maximum detrusor pressure, cystometric capacity, and reflex volume) were analyzed. The urodynamic procedure and reporting was in compliance with the International Continence Society guidelines.[12]

Post- and pre-CMG parameters were determined as percentage change for each patient [Equation 1].

PostPrePre×100 1

Percentage change >10% was marked as an improvement, while percentage change <−10% was deemed to have worsened the bladder state. Percentage change falling between −10% and +10% was marked as no improvement.

Pre- and post-urodynamics parameters were analyzed for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. At 95% of confidence interval, P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Feedback questionnaire

Each participant filled a satisfaction questionnaire at the end of study.

RESULTS

Twenty SCI patients (3 female and 17 male) with mean age of 36 years, meeting the key inclusion criteria, were recruited. Participant’s demographic details are shown in [Table 1].

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the study population.
Subject Age Duration of injury
(month)
Level of injury Type of Injury Cause of Injury AIS Grade Sex
S1 45 18 T5 I N - F
S2 47 12 L3 I N - M
S3 46 99 T5 C T A M
S4 28 9 T5 C T A M
S5 37 60 T5 C T A M
S6 26 15 T7 I N - M
S7 36 18 T4 C T A M
S8 27 54 T5 C T A M
S9 25 80 T6 C T A M
S10 34 42 T4 I T B M
S11 28 42 C5 I N - F
S12 24 12 T4 C T A M
S13 47 48 T10 I T B M
S14 44 36 T8 I N - M
S15 59 21 T9 C T A M
S16 27 12 C5 I T C M
S17 23 30 T4 C N - F
S18 56 120 T5 C T A M
S19 22 29 T8 I N - M
S20 41 132 C8 I N - M
Median 35 33 I=10 T=12 A=9 F=3
Min 22 9 C=10 N=8 B=2 M=17
Max 59 132 C=1

I=Incomplete, C=Complete, N=Non-traumatic, T=Traumatic, M=Male, F=Female, AIS=American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale

Following treatment, 12 subjects showed an increase in reflex volume. Six participants showed a decrease in the reflex volume, and two had no significant change. Thirteen patients were seen to reduce maximum detrusor pressure from the baseline, while three had increased and four did not show any significant change. Fourteen subjects showed considerable improvement in bladder capacity, three did not show any improvement, while bladder capacity was reduced in three persons. Change in maximum pressure was −12.49 ± 35.69 (mean ± sd) cm H2O, reflex volume was 45.75 ± 88.71 mL, and cystometric capacity was 69.88 ± 104.64 mL [Table 2]. The P-value, for pre- and post-change in detrusor pressure (P = 0.03) and cystometric capacity (P = 0.04), was significant. However, change in reflex volume (P = 0.13) was not significant.

Table 2: Pre and Post CMG data.
Subject Reflex Volume Max Detrusor Pressure Cystometric Capacity
Pre Post % change Pre Post %Change Pre Post %Change
S1 202 171 -15.3 34 31 -8.8 205 177 -13.7
S2 342 275 -19.6 53 48 -9.4 397 357 -10.1
S3 206 347 68.4 64 88 37.5 265 820 209.4
S4 136 176 29.4 94 73 -22.3 152 273 79.6
S5 117 200 70.9 26 19 -26.9 117 207 76.9
S6 47 69 46.8 109 82 -24.8 53 97 83.0
S7 125 404 223.2 162 86 -46.9 128 439 243.0
S8 230 347 50.9 73 76 4.1 381 500 31.2
S9 168 221 31.5 56 41 -26.8 169 246 45.6
S10 340 337 -0.9 100 82 -18.0 343 355 3.5
S11 24 33 37.5 91 42 -53.8 24 47 95.8
S12 296 165 -44.3 53 47 -11.3 354 169 -52.3
S13 152 122 -19.7 101 87 -13.9 163 147 -9.8
S14 180 120 -33.3 44 84 90.9 270 171 -36.7
S15 196 143 -27.0 90 69 -23.3 200 196 -2.0
S16 130 219 68.5 61 58 -4.9 130 219 68.5
S17 64 84 31.3 77 49 -36.4 68 85 25.0
S18 76 83 9.2 93 132 41.9 81 83 2.5
S19 30 128 326.7 158 49 -69.0 30 130 333.3
S20 157 284 80.9 47 34 -27.7 157 510 224.8
Mean 160.9 196.4 45.75 79.3 63.85 -12.49 184.35 261.4 69.88
Std. Dev 92.79 105.77 88.71 36.41 26.72 35.69 116.19 189.14 104.64
Std. Err 20.75 23.65 19.87 8.14 5.98 7.98 25.98 42.29 23.40
Improved 12 Improved 13 Improved 14
Worsen 6 Worsen 3 Worsen 3
Not improved 2 Not improved 4 Not improved 3

[Figure 2] shows a trend in number of leaks (2a), fluid intake in a day (2b), urine output in a day (2c), maximum urine output of the day (2d), and similar number of CIC (2e) in bladder diary of a subject who had a noticeable improvement. Number of CIC reduced in three participants. During the study period, one subject developed UTI, which was managed with culture-specific antibiotics and stimulation period was extended to compensate for these days. Eighteen subjects showed improvement in bladder diary, while two participants did not show any noticeable change [Table 3]. Binomial distribution test on bladder diary data showed significant improvement (P = 0.001). All subjects reported satisfaction with treatment for the simplicity and ease in the stimulation procedure.

Figure 2:
Bladder diary of a participant during the study period showing, (a) number of leaks, (b) total fluid intake in a day, (c) total urine output in a day, (d) maximum urine output in a day, and (e) number of clean intermittent catheterization.
Table 3: Binomial distribution test using voiding diary data.
Sample size (n) Improved
no. (%)
Not improved
no. (%)
Test prop P-value
20 18 (90%) 2 (10%) 0.5 0.001

DISCUSSION

Management of neurogenic bladder focuses to protect upper urinary tract with a goal to provide low-pressure storage of urine in the bladder and continence. Detrusor overactivity leads to high bladder pressure, small bladder capacity, possible vesicoureteral reflux, and subsequently impairment of renal functions.[13] CIC and anticholinergic drugs are the gold standards in the management of detrusor overactivity. Intravesical agents such as Botulinum-A, Oxybutynin, and Capsaicin are commonly used for reduction of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. These medical management have side-effects and long-term efficacy is not certainty.[14]

Alternatively, sacral neuromodulation, pudendal nerve, and tibial nerve stimulation are novel approaches in management of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. These approaches have varied success rates preventing them to replace standard medical practices.[10,11] Many researchers have used percutaneous tibial nerve (PTN) stimulation technique with a needle electrode, as anode, is inserted posterior to the medial malleolus and a surface electrode, as cathode, over the ipsilateral calcaneus with maximum current strength of 10 mA was used.[15,16] Our previous study was first to establish surface stimulation of tibial and dorsal penile nerve in modulating urinary bladder reflex pathway, a neuromodulation technique. Participants who had undergone treatment witnessed beneficial effects of this approach and found to be easy-to-implement non-invasive technique.[1,9]

The studies on use of electrical stimulation of the somatic afferent pathways for bladder reports effectiveness of neuromodulation technique.[17,18] Tai et al. have demonstrated usage of foot stimulation in suppression of bladder overactivity in the cat model.[17] Medial plantar nerve is a mixed sensory-motor nerve and is a branch of posterior tibial nerve. These have same spinal pathway targeted for sacral neuromodulation and are also involved in motor and sensory control of pelvic floor and bladder.[16] Urinary bladder activity is inhibited by electrical stimulation of these somatic afferent fibers leading to central inhibition of the micturition reflex pathway in the brain or spinal cord.[16]

This prospective study was conducted to observe effect of surface foot stimulation of medial plantar nerve in reducing the detrusor overactivity. Surface stimulation is preferred over percutaneous stimulation due to its non-invasive approach. Further, current strength is higher in surface stimulation than percutaneous stimulation to overcome skin impedance. We found that gel-based self-adhesive surface pad electrodes are cost-effective, convenient, and easy to use for home-based therapy. The bill of material for inhouse developed stimulator, that is, cmcUroModul@tor® is <Rs 2000.

To check the intact spinal reflex bladder, f-wave test from PTN was used in our previous study.[1,9] However, additional expenses and a visit to electrophysiology laboratory are required for f-wave test leading to delay in treatment. Hence, the presence of ankle jerk was used.

The parameters accessed from CMG were maximum detrusor pressure, cystometric capacity, and reflex-volume. There was statistical significant improvement in maximum detrusor pressure (P = 0.03) and cystometric capacity (P = 0.04) while reflex volume (P = 0.13) did not show statistical significant improvement. All participants were satisfied with ease of procedure and treatment methodology.

The bladder diary had record of urinary output and fluid intake of the day. After 2 weeks of electrical stimulation therapy, it was observed from the bladder diary that 18 participants had improvement in cystometric capacity, reduction in number of leaks, and increase in maximum urine output in a day. There was no significance difference in two participants while statistically significant improvement in the parameters from bladder diary was observed suggesting the effectiveness of electrical stimulation. There was an improvement in total urine voided throughout the day and maximum urine voided in a day in a subject (S1). However, in 2nd week of stimulation therapy, he had a rise in number of leaks. Clinical symptoms correlated to urinary infection and thus he was treated with culture-specific antibiotics, and therapeutic stimulation was extended for 1 week.

The bladder diary of a subject (S20) presented increased fluid consumption and improvement in urine voided without any statistical significant reduction in number of leaks. The subject’s transrectal ultrasound imaging showed open bladder neck condition. Despite this, there was 224% of increase in cystometric capacity, 80% of increase in reflex volume, and 27% of decrease in maximum detrusor pressure. This case is an instance of mixed pathology with a combined open bladder neck and detrusor overactivity condition.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study on participants with detrusor overactivity due to SCI showed improvement in bladder function. Pre- and post-stimulation of medial plantar nerve at the sole of foot following 2 weeks of daily ½ h therapy showed improvement in bladder diary and CMG.

Our study reports statistically significant increase in cystometric capacity and reduction in maximum detrusor pressure. In contrast, reflex volume did not show any statistically significant results.

Of 20 subjects, 18 showed improvement in bladder diary while two participants did not improve. The results of this study indicates that the stimulation therapy given for the period of 2 weeks can modulate the bladder reflex pathways thereby it has potential for an alternative and safe treatment for urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. None of the subjects reported any adverse effect of the treatment. This study will pave the way for larger studies for statistically conclusive results. Furthermore, studies involving standardization of stimulation parameters are warranted to set up treatment protocol as alternative approach for urinary bladder dysfunction due to bladder overactivity.

Results of our study show that neuromodulation therapy by surface foot stimulation of medial plantar nerve is noninvasive, cost-effective, safe and simple, and have potential substitute for management of urinary bladder incontinence due to overactive detrusor.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fluid Research Grant of CMC Vellore for their approval. We are also grateful to Department of Science and Technology (Technology Interventions for the Disabled and Elderly), Government of India for their support. The authors also thank participants who consented for the study.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Fluid Research Grant, Christian Medical College, Vellore and Department of Science and (Technology Interventions for the Disabled and Elderly).

References

  1. . Control of Urinary Bladder Dysfunction In: PhD Thesis. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala: SCTIMST; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Urinary incontinence and depression. J Urol. 1999;162:82-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1548-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Perceptions of patients with spinal cord injury on future research in South India. Soc Care Neurodisabil. 2012;3:20-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Priorities of desired functional recovery in Indian spinal cord injury patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:896-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Medical management of neurogenic bladder with oral therapy. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:51-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Electrical stimulation of sacral roots for micturition after spinal cord injury. Urol Clin North Am. 1993;20:505-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Adverse event assessment of antimuscarinics for treating overactive bladder: A network meta-analytic approach. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16718.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Neuromodulation by surface electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves for reduction of detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury: A pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:207-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Control of urinary bladder function with devices: Successes and failures. Prog Brain Res. 2006;152:163-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. . Neuroprostheses to treat neurogenic bladder dysfunction: Current status and future perspectives. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20:75-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1243-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Increasing bladder capacity by foot stimulation in rats with spinal cord injuries. BMC Urol. 2017;17:85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . The effectiveness of intravesical oxybutynin, propantheline, and capsaicin in the management of neuropathic bladder following spinal cord injury. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:1683-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: Results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010;183:1438-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: A clinically and cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13:327-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Suppression of bladder overactivity by activation of somatic afferent nerves in the foot. BJU Int. 2011;107:303-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of somatic afferent nerves in the foot relieved symptoms related to postoperative bladder spasms. BMC Urol. 2017;17:58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections