Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Images in Neurosciences
11 (
3
); 502-503
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1713304

An Aberrant Line on CT Head: The Mendosal Suture

Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Jaskaran Singh Gosal, MCh Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005 India jhsgosal_87@hotmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

A knowledge of variant anatomy is important in clinical practice. The skull bones have several normal anatomical variations, especially in the occipital bone. Accessory sutures have been described in newborns and young children.

In this study, we discussed radiological findings of an accessory occipital suture in a 14-year-old child who had presented with mastoiditis and brain abscess. We further describe this “mendosal suture,” and its pathophysiology and clinical implications. It is important to bear this entity in mind to avoid misdiagnosing this as a fracture. The use of CT scans and 3D CT using volume rendering technique (VRT) helps in detection and correct diagnosis.

Keywords

computed tomography
craniofacial
imaging
neuroanatomy

Introduction

A knowledge of variant anatomy is often as important in clinical practice as is being familiar with the normal anatomy. This helps clinicians be wary of overdiagnosing a pathology when there is, in fact, none. Skull radiographs often reveal such variances, especially in newborns and young children. This holds especially true for the occipital bone where accessory sutures have been described.1

We recently treated a 14-year-old with chronic mastoiditis and consequent left-sided cerebellar abscess. Left suboccipital craniotomy, drainage of the abscess, as well as mastoidectomy was done. The child recovered well postsurgery. However, retrospective analysis of the head CT (including 3D reconstruction by VRT [volume rendering technique]) revealed a well-developed accessory occipital suture running from one asterion to the other, and dividing the occipital bone into a superior and an inferior part Fig. 1. This suture, also called the mendosal suture (from Latin mendosus meaning “faulty” or “incorrect”) or the transverse occipital suture, has been found in up to 3% of the Indian population,1 and up to 14% in other postmortem studies.2 However, most of these skulls have sutures that are either unilateral or bilateral but discontinuous at the midline.2 They are also usually described only in children below the age of 6 years.3 We reported an extremely rare case of a complete mendosal suture.

Fig. 1 (A) 3D VRT image showing the mendosal suture (arrow) when viewing the skull from behind. (B) Lateral VRT projection showing the suture (arrow). (C) Sagittal CT bone window showing the mendosal suture (arrow) distinct from the lambdoidal suture seen above. (D) Coronal CT bone window showing that this suture ran the whole distance from one asterion to another. Abbreviation: VRT, volume rendering technique.

Fig. 1 (A) 3D VRT image showing the mendosal suture (arrow) when viewing the skull from behind. (B) Lateral VRT projection showing the suture (arrow). (C) Sagittal CT bone window showing the mendosal suture (arrow) distinct from the lambdoidal suture seen above. (D) Coronal CT bone window showing that this suture ran the whole distance from one asterion to another. Abbreviation: VRT, volume rendering technique.

The occipital bone develops from six ossification centers in utero. Most of them fuse by the time of birth. Mendosal suture is seen due to incomplete or improper fusion of the interparietal (planum occipitale) and supraoccipital (planum nuchale) portions of the occipital bone. This results in an outward convex bulge of the midportion of the occipital bone, called bathrocephaly, as is seen in our patient.4 It may easily be confused with fracture lines if the clinician is unaware of this normal variation.5 6 However, accessory sutures make a zig-zag pattern with interdigitations and have sclerotic borders similar to major calvarial sutures.7 They are also often bilateral and symmetrical. Fracture lines, on the other hand, have sharp lucencies with nonsclerotic edges and have associated soft tissue swelling or hematoma. Furthermore, the mendosal suture can be confused with lambdoid suture while searching for asterion during retromastoid suboccipital craniotomy, and its existence should therefore be known to all the neurosurgeons.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. , , , et al . The mendosal suture of the occipital bone: occurrence in Indian population, embryology and clinical significance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(4):329-332.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al . The mendosal suture. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25(6):730-733.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . CT of normal developmental and variant anatomy of the pediatric skull: distinguishing trauma from normality. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1585-1601.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . A persistent mendosal suture presenting with bathrocephaly. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;73:110.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Accessory occipital suture mimicking fracture in head trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(3):530.e7-530.e8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Unusual accessory cranial sutures in pediatric head trauma–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003;43(2):80-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Occipital sutures and its variations: the value of 3D-CT and how to differentiate it from fractures using 3D-CT? Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(9):807-816.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,059

PDF downloads
168
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections