Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
4 (
3
); 355-356

Commentary

Department of Otolaryngology (Neurotology), Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Address for correspondence: Dr. Erika Celis-Aguilar, Eustaquio Buelna No. 91 Col. Gabriel Leyva, C.P. 80030, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. E-mail: erikacelis@hotmail.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sen et al. describe an interesting case that drives our attention towards the diversity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions that can be seen in a cryptococcal central nervous system (CNS) infection. The article named: The Enigma of Transient Splenial Hyperintensity – in Cryptococcal Meningitis focus on a temporary lesion on the corpus callosum as an only lesion on the MRI (also known as the boomerang sign).[1]

Cryptococcus neoformans is an encapsulated yeast found in dust and bird droppings. Infection is acquired through inhalation of spores. The most common neurologic presentation in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and cryptococcosis is meningitis.

Although MRI has been reported as normal in some patients with cryptococcosis and CNS involvement; characteristic brain lesions have been described as pathognomonic for this entity. Some examples are dilated Virchow–Robin spaces and cryptococcoma.[23] Transient hyperintensity of corpus callosum due to cryptococcosis, as the authors point out, has not been described previously in the literature.

Some of the MRI findings of a patient with meningitis and cryptococcosis are due to the mucoid material produce by the cryptococcal organism (derived from the capsule of C. neoformans) that explains the hyperintensity in T2 images and hypointensity in T1 sequence.[23] No gadolinium enhancement is seen. The localization of most lesions follows the pattern of cryptococcal spread; it begins on the basal cisterns, through the Virchow–Robin spaces, and continues to the basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem. Finally, the cryptococcoma localizes in the brain parenchyma. This lesion represents a collection of organisms, inflammatory cells and mucoid material. Furthermore, the mucoid material from the cryptococcoma dilates the perivascular spaces (Virchow–Robin), which gives the characteristic MRI image.[23]

In the moment of choosing the right imaging modality (MRI vs CT scan) for patients with cryptococcosis and CNS infection, authors have found that MRI detected more cryptococcal-related lesions than CT scan. In a study, cryptococcal-related lesions were found in 24% of patients with CT scan compared with 79% of patients that underwent MRI.[2] It is important to keep in mind that other associated pathologies (AIDS or other type of neurological infection) might also show abnormalities in both imaging modalities. Some examples are cerebral atrophy, edema, hydrocephalus and/or mass effect.[23]

The value of MRI in patients with cryptococcosis is highlighted by Charlier et al. that found an association between the presence of MRI neurologic lesions (due to cryptococcosis) and CSF antigen titers, high serum antigen titers and finally neurological abnormalities. These findings are relevant since the antigen titers have prognostic value.[2] On the other hand, transient hyperintensity of splenial corpus callosum can be due to a number of factors, such as epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs, vitamin B12 deficiency, mild encephalitis, disseminated encephalitis, Marchiafava–Bignami disease, multiple sclerosis, trauma, and not to overlook are influenza-associated encephalitis and herpes simplex infection, as well as brain radiation therapy and aging.[4567]

The corpus callosum is the largest commissural white bundle in the brain; the splenium irrigation derives, in contrast to the rest of the corpus callosum, from the vertebro-basilar system.[8] The main proposed mechanism of a transient splenial lesion is edema, although this case could be theorized to be caused by the cryptococcal load.

As the authors point out, transient splenial corpus callosum hyperintensity is due mainly by the use of epileptic drugs or epilepsy; if the patient has neither, the clinician has to discard other diagnosis. Clinical history, examination and laboratory tests can rule out other diseases. This patient was known to be immunosuppressed and develop frank neurological disease with fever. In this scenario a cryptococcal infection must be sought through specific tests.

As more MRI tests are prescribed for different neurological diseases, it is possible that an increasing number of pathologies are associated with a reversible lesion at the corpus callosum. This study is an example of that phenomenon.

It is also interesting to notice the temporality of the MRI lesion. In our experience, we reported one case with meningeal cryptococcosis that also developed a transient sign in the physical exploration: reversible hearing loss; hearing improvement developed only after the specific treatment (amphotericin, fluconazole and steroids) was prescribed; in this particular case, areas of hyperintensity in T2 sequence were found on caudate and lenticular nucleus on the MRI image.[9] Probably, the reduction in cryptococcal overload after therapy may explain the transient features of this disease.

Sen et al. describe a case that highlights the transient splenial hyperintensity that can result from a cryptococcal neurologic infection. A brief review of cryptococcal CNS imaging is made.

References

  1. , , , , . The Enigma of transient splenial hyperintensity: In cryptococcal meningitis. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2013;4:352-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Cryptococcal neuroradiological lesions correlate with severity during cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in HIV-positive patients in the HAART era. . PLos ONE. 3:e1950. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone 0001950
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Magnetic resonance imaging findings in AIDS patients with central nervous system cryptococcosis. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25:211-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Reversible cytotoxic edema in the splenium of the corpus callosum related to antiepileptic treatment: Report of two cases and literature review. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1633-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Boomerang sign: Clinical significance of transient lesion in the splenium of corpus callosum. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15:151-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Transient splenial lesion of the corpus callosum in clinically mild influenza-associated encephalitis/encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradio. 2006;27:1983-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Focal lesion in the splenium of the corpus callosum on FLAIR MR Images: A common finding in aging and after brain radiation therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:855-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . MR imaging of the corpus callosum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:949-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Auditory neuropathy secondary to cryptococcal central nervous system infection in 2 immunocompromised patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:597-8.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    971

    PDF downloads
    331
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections