Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to the Editor
12 (
2
); 450-451
doi:
10.1055/s-0041-1726658

A Novel Technique of Closure of Scalp Defects under Tension

Department of Neurosurgery, National Neurosciences Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Prasad Krishnan, MS, MCh Department of Neurosurgery, National Neurosciences Centre 2nd Floor, Peerless Hospital Campus, 360, Panchasayar, Garia 700094, Kolkata, West Bengal India prasad.krishnan@rediffmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

A 34-year-old lady underwent craniotomy and left frontal contusionectomy following a road traffic accident. Postoperatively, she had wound breakdown and underwent resuturing of the scalp on two separate occasions. These too gave way and she presented to us 1 month after the initial surgery with purulent discharge from the wound with exposed bone flap (Fig. 1A). Culture of the pus showed growth of pseudomonas and contrast enhanced computed tomography scan of the brain showed no evidence of any collection below the bone flap. She was put on antibiotics and underwent wound debridement, removal of the bone flap and infected granulation tissue, but on attempting to close the skin there was difficulty in approximating the margins. Due to scraping out of the wound margins, some galeal loss near the margins too was present. Further, the patient had not been prepared for a flap closure as we had not anticipated difficulty in closing the wound and had assumed that after removing the bone flap redundant skin would be present. Initially pulley sutures were placed in an attempt to draw the margins together, but they were cutting out due to poor soft tissue support below the skin at the margins. Hence, horizontal mattress sutures were placed and the suture was passed through small pieces of external ventricular drain (EVD) tubing to distribute the tension evenly over the margins and prevent skin necrosis (Fig. 1B). The wound got apposed well and healed satisfactorily when sutures were removed after 21 days (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1 Clinical photographs showing (A) wound dehiscence with the exposed bone flap and purulent discharge, (B) horizontal mattress sutures placed over external ventricular drain tubing to achieve skin approximation, and (C) satisfactory wound healing after suture removal.

Fig. 1 Clinical photographs showing (A) wound dehiscence with the exposed bone flap and purulent discharge, (B) horizontal mattress sutures placed over external ventricular drain tubing to achieve skin approximation, and (C) satisfactory wound healing after suture removal.

Surgeons attempting to close scalp defects that are not unduly large use one of two techniques—(1) undermining the flap in the subgaleal plane or (2) employing pulley sutures to close the wound. Undermining the scalp decreases the tension on wound margins while closing the defect1 and Raposio et al have documented “progressive decrease in tension” with increasing amounts of undermining of the scalp.1 While this is the commonest technique employed by neurosurgeons to achieve wound closure in scalp defects, a subgaleal pocket is created where collections might accumulate. Hence, in our case, as there was documented infection, we did not attempt to undermine the upper margin of the wound posteriorly for fear of giving the septic process space to spread. Pulley sutures (employing the “far-near, near-far” technique) have the advantage of avoiding undermining and can be used in areas of poor tissue mobility.2 Wound necrosis at the margins has been reported with this technique2 particularly if all the “passes” of these sutures do not include the galea. In our cases as the galea was lost near the margins for a few millimeters (following scraping), this technique could not be used (the near throws of the suture would be holding only epidermis and subcutaneous connective tissue and would cut through).

We then decided to employ horizontal mattress sutures to aid in skin approximation. As the needle would pass “far” from the margins in both directions, galeal support was ensured. The inherent disadvantage of horizontal mattress sutures—force deployed parallel to the wound margins—was mitigated by passing it through the soft EVD tubing to ensure cushioning of the epidermis from the tightness of the suture.

Though this kind of closure is commonly employed in secondary suturing of abdominal wound dehiscence, we did not find such a technique reported in scalp closure. As our patient had a satisfactory outcome both in terms of wound approximation and cosmesis, we feel this could be a useful technique for closing selected cases of scalp defects.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. , , , . Undermining of the scalp: quantitative effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(5):1218-1222.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Progressive tightening of pulley sutures for primary repair of large scalp wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(12):e1592.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
2,307

PDF downloads
290
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections