Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_159_2025

The effect of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index on cognitive impairment in post-ischemic stroke patient: A case–control study

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia.

*Corresponding author: Fulvian Budi Azhar, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia. doktervian@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Azhar FB, Yusril Y, Junaidi A, Marisdina S, Handayani S, Nindela R, et al. The effect of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index to cognitive impairment on post-ischemic stroke patient: A case–control study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_159_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Clinical manifestation of cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke can occur as a cognitive impairment. Complete examination, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is mandatory for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment in stroke patients. In Indonesia, access to MRI examination is still very limited; thus, an alternative examination is necessary. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) examination is a non-invasive modality to assess intracranial vessels. Many studies have stated that intracranial peripheral resistance strongly correlates with cognitive decline. This study intended to measure the effect of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) measured by TCD in post-stroke patients with cognitive impairment.

Materials and Methods:

An observational analytic study with an unmatched case–control design to measure the odds ratio (OR) was performed from January 2022 to April 2022 in Moehammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, in post-ischemic stroke patients.

Results:

About 79.3% (P = 0.015) of patients were recorded with high PI. Statistically, there is a relationship between high MCA PI and cognitive impairment, and according to the (OR) measurement, the value was 4.718, with a confidence interval of 1.481–15.032.

Conclusion:

MCA PI has a relationship to post-ischemic stroke cognitive impairment and age and dyslipidemia may serve as confounding factors for cognitive impairment.

Keywords

Mild cognitive impairment
Montreal cognitive assessment Indonesia version
Pulsatility index
Transcranial Doppler

INTRODUCTION

Clinical manifestations of cerebrovascular diseases, such as stroke, can occur as a cognitive impairment.[1] It was stated that the risk of a patient developing mild cognitive impairment after stroke or transient ischemic attack is increased and around 35.2% of ischemic stroke patients someday will develop a cognitive impairment.[2,3] Complete neuropsychology is necessary for diagnosing cognitive impairment and a neuroimaging examination, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is mandatory to pinpoint the exact brain region that had an infarcted lesion.[4] Unfortunately, in Indonesia, access to MRI examination is still minimal; thus, an alternative examination is necessary.

Some studies have stated that vascular dysfunction has a very strong relationship with cognitive impairment, and the changes in vessel structures and function play an important role in cognitive decline after a stroke event.[5] Structural and functional of cerebral vessels can be assessed through transcranial Doppler (TCD) examination. TCD examination is a noninvasive modality to assess intracranial vessels. Many studies have stated that intracranial peripheral resistance strongly correlates with cognitive decline. In one study, it was stated that intracranial peripheral resistance, defined as the pulsatility index (PI) in the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA), can be used as a predicting factor of cognitive decline in patients with hypertension.[4] However, in a different study, it was concluded that there was no relationship between MCA in diabetic patients with cognitive declining.[6]

Indonesia, as a developing nation with a large population, has a significant burden of after-stroke event symptoms. With the increase of cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke events and with the increase of non-communicable diseases in Indonesia, it become mandatory for a rural hospital or clinicians that do not have access to a still considered luxurious neuroimaging examination such as MRI. TCD may serve as an alternative for clinicians to predict cognitive decline in stroke patients. Thus, this study intended to measure the effect of the MCA PI measured by TCD in post-stroke patients with cognitive impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational analytic study with an unmatched case– control design to measure the odds ratio (OR) was performed from January 2022 to April 2022 in Moehammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang neurology outpatient clinic in post-ischemic stroke patients. Cognitive impairment was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Indonesia Version (Moca-Ina), and then, the participants were divided into a case group and a control group. The permission to use Moca was obtained before the research began. After that, the PI will be measured by a certified neurosonologist for each group. Cognitive assessments were performed in patients who had a first stroke event and approximately 3 months onset. Vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart dyslipidemia, and coronary artery disease, were also recorded as confounding factors.

Statistical analysis

The data were collected in the master table, and then, statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 24.0 to measure the OR. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 58 participants who were divided into 29 controls group and 29 cases group. The demographic and clinical characteristics and their relation with cognitive status are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics within cognitive status.
Variables Cognitive status n(%) P-value
Impairment (%) Normal (%)
Age (in years)
  <55 6 (20.7) 16 (55.2) 22 (37.9) 0.015
  ≥55 23 (79.3) 13 (44.8) 36 (62.1)
Gender
  Male 19 (65.5) 19 (65.5) 38 (65.5) 1.0
  Female 10 (34.5) 10 (34.5) 20 (34.5)
Hypertension 25 (86.2) 19 (65.5) 44 (75.9) 0.125
No hypertension 4 (13.8) 10 (34.5) 14 (24.1)
Diabetes mellitus 12 (41.4) 9 (31) 21 (36.2) 0.585
No diabetes melitus 17 (58.5) 20 (69) 37 (63.8)
Dyslipidemia 19 (65.5) 8 (27.6) 27 (46.6) 0.008
No dyslipidemia 10 (34.5) 21 (72.4) 31 (53.4)
Coronary artery disease 5 (17.2) 5 (17.2) 10 (17.2) 1.0
No coronary artery disease 24 (82.8) 24 (82.8) 24 (82.8)
Atrial fibrilation 3 (10.3) 3 (10.3) 6 (10.3) 0.665
No atrial fibrilation 26 (89.7) 26 (89.7) 52 (89.7)
Smoking 9 (31) 15 (51.7) 24 (41.4) 0.183
No smoking 20 (69) 14 (48.3) 34 (58.6)
Infarct location
  Frontal 1 (3.4) 1 (3.4) 2 (3.4) 0.391
  Temporal 7 (24.1) 2 (6.9) 9 (15.5)
  Parietal 8 (27.6) 8 (27.6) 16 (27.6)
  Oksipital 3 (10.3) 2 (6.9) 5 (8.6)
  Thalamus 1 (3.4) 4 (13.8) 5 (8.6)
  Basal ganglia 9 (31) 12 (41.4) 21 (36.2)

P<0.05 considered statistically significant

The most found risk factor in patient post-ischemic patients with cognitive impairment is hypertension (86.2%, P = 0.125) followed by dyslipidemia (65.5%, P = 0.008), with the majority of patients with cognitive impairment within more than 55 years old. (79.3%, P = 0.015) and the most common gender is male (65.5%, P = 1.0).

As seen in Table 2, in total, there were 79.3% (P = 0.015) of patients who were recorded with high PI, which means statistically that there is a relation between high MCA PI and cognitive impairment, and according to the OR measurement, the value was 4.718 with a confidence interval (CI): 1.481–15.032.

Table 2: The effect of middle cerebral artery pulsatilitiy index on cognitive impairment.
PI Cognitive status n(%) P-value OR (CI)
Impairment (%) Normal (%)
High 23 (79.3) 13 (44.8) 36 (62.1) 0.015 4.718 with CI: 1.481–15.032
Normal 6 (20.7) 16 (55.2) 22 (37.9)

CI: Confidence interval, OR: Odds ratio, PI: Pulsatility index

After the bivariate analysis was performed, further analysis was carried out to analyze the confounding factors that had P < 0.25 such as age, dyslipidemia, smoking, and hypertension. Logistic regression was performed to observe the interaction between confounding variables and dependent variables. As seen in Table 3, it was concluded that hypertension did not have any interaction and was ruled out in the first regression. After further analysis, the gold standard model was found, such as PI, age, dyslipidemia, and smoking with OR = 4.417 (CI: 1.015–19.218). Hence, it can be concluded that age and dyslipidemia have a major role in post-ischemic stroke cognitive impairment.

Table 3: Multivariate analysis for variable interaction.
Step 1a Variables B S.E. Wald df Significance Exp (B) 95% CI for EXP (B)
Lower Upper
Main effects PI −19.184 14677.473 0.000 1 0.999 0.000 0.000
Hypertension 0.756 1.009 0.561 1 0.454 2.130 0.295 15.385
Dyslipidemia 1.106 0.882 1.571 1 0.210 3.021 0.536 17.023
Interaction terms Age 1.550 0.945 2.693 1 0.101 4.712 0.740 30.020
Hypertension+PI 38.709 20112.653 0.000 1 0.998 64736447620000000.000 0.000
Dyslipidemia+PI 40.079 15896.566 0.000 1 0.998 25461455400000.000 0.000
Smoking −2.110 0.910 5.374 1 0.020 0.121 0.020 0.722
PI+smoking 1.226 16890.390 0.000 1 1.000 3.408 0.000
PI+age −1.5638 1464.331 0.000 1 1.000 0.215 0.000
Constant −0.686 0.695 0.972 1 0.324 0.504

CI: Confidence interval, PI: Pulsatility index, SE: Standard errors, B: Unstandardized Coefficient /Regression Coefficient, Wald: Wald Chi-Square Test Statistic, df: Degrees of Freedom, Exp(B): Exponentiated Coefficient = Odds Ratio.

DISCUSSION

This study divided the age groups following the previous study, with a cut of 55 years.[7] The majority of the patients age is within above 55 years old (62.1%). This is similar to the previous study that shows ischemic stroke more often occurred at more than 55 years old in which 62.4%.[8] Structural changes in the intracranial vessel can inhibit cortical neurovascular coupling that will result in cognitive detoriation.[8] Male is the most common gender found to have ischemic stroke (65.5%). There is also a similarity with other studies in Indonesia that show males (62.5%) who were more prone to suffer from stroke.[9] It was stated that females have neuroprotectant factors from estrogen and progesterone.[10] Stroke incidence in females will increase when menopause starts to occur.[11] Vascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus also play a big role in vessel remodeling that will speed up vessel degeneration.[11]

In our study, risk factors that affect cognitive status are age (P = 0.015) and dyslipidemia (P = 0.008). Endotel dysfunction will more that occur due to risk factors that will disrupt the autoregulation and neurovascular coupling mechanism.[8] Cholesterol plays a big role in the degeneration process of beta-amyloid precursor peptide protein that will cause an accumulation of beta-amyloid peptide in the brain that will speed up the process of cognitive impairment.[12]

The most common risk factors identified were hypertension (86.2% P = 0.125) and diabetes mellitus (41.4% P = 0.585), although statistically there were no relations found. Differences between risk factors exposure are different and very individualistic dependent that statistically very hard to control and to identify within a specific timeline. This study also only acquire a small number of other risk factors such as coronary artery disease and smoking.

In Table 2, we can conclude that MCA PI effect affected cognitive impairment in post-ischemic stroke patients. In transcranial Doppler examination, PI shows high peripheral resistance that shows microangiopathy changes within intracerebral vessels. Lim et al found that MCI patient who progressed to dementia had high baseline PI.[13] High PI indicates high peripheral resistance and reflects microangiopathic changes in cerebral blood vessels.[13] Bieson in his study found that dementia patient has a high PI.[5] The most common cognitive impairment in post-ischemic stroke patients is very related to the formation of cerebral small-vessel disease (CSVD) and the diagnosis of CSVD requires MRI examination.[1] Kneihsl et al. stated that the thickening of the aorta will affect arterial systematically and increase intracranial PI that can trigger CSVD.[14] In Indonesia, access to MRI examination for diagnosing CSVD is still a major problem that can also affect further treatment; thus, PI can be considered for a CSVD and cognitive impairment. Altman has stated that PI can be considered as a reflection of deep intracranial resistance and also affects MMSE score.[15] Relationships found statistically in this study, which may serve PI to become a predictor of cognitive impairment in post-ischemic stroke events. The limitation of PI is that PI does not always show full vascular resistance that sometimes also affected by systemic hymodinamics.[14] The Research Process Flowchart is shown in Supplementary File 1

Supplementary File
Table 4: Confounding variables analysis.
Step 2a B S.E. Wald df Significance Exp 95% confidence interval for exp (B)
Lower Upper
Variables PI (1) 1.485 0.750 3.920 1 0.048 4.417 1.015 19.218
Dyslipidemia (1) 2.403 0.801 8.997 1 0.003 11.058 2.300 53.164
Smoking (1) −1.877 0.796 5.556 1 0.018 0.153 0.032 0.729
Age (1) 1.632 0.759 4.629 1 0.031 5.115 1.156 22.624
Constant −1.324 0.682 3.771 1 0.052 0.266

SE: Standard errors, B: Unstandardized Coefficient /Regression Coefficient, Wald: Wald Chi-Square Test Statistic, df: Degrees of Freedom, Exp: Exponentiated Coefficient.

Limitation

The limitation of this patient was we did not perform matching between cases and the control group. A longer and larger retrospective study with matching may be needed to see the actual outcome.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the MCA PI has a relationship to post-ischemic stroke cognitive impairment, and age and dyslipidemia may serve as confounding factors for cognitive impairment.

Ethical approval:

The research/study approved by the Institutional Review Board at KEPK RSMH, number No.15/kepkrsmh/2022, dated January 24, 2022.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , . Vascular cognitive impairment. Circ Res. 2017;120:573-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;176:139-48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Profil doppler transkranial pada gangguan fungsi kognitif pascastroke Iskemik. Neurona. Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index as predictor of cognitive impairment in hypertensive patients. Front Neurol. 2018;9:538.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Cerebral hemodynamics in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59:369-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Correlation between pulsatility index of medial cerebri artery and cognitive function in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020;8:2044-50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Perbedaan gangguan kognitif subjek stroke iskemik berdasarkan sisi hemiparesis. Maj Kedokt Neurosains Perhimpun Dr Spes Saraf Indones. 2020;37:96-100.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Aging and ischemic stroke. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11:2542-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Hubungan stroke iskemik dengan gangguan fungsi kognitif di RS universitas sumatera utara. Scr SCORE Sci Med J. 2020;2:20-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Sex differences in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:2100-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of stroke and associated risk factors in sleman district of Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia. Stroke Res Treat. 2019;2019:2642458.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Blood cholesterol in late-life and cognitive decline: A longitudinal study of the Chinese elderly. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12:24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Cerebrovascular hemodynamics on transcranial doppler ultrasonography and cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65:651-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Intracranial pulsatility in relation to severity and progression of cerebral white matter hyperintensities. Stroke. 2020;51:3302-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index is associated with cognitive impairment in lacunar stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26:431-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections