Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
16 (
Supplement 1
); S36-S40
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_422_2024

Post-stroke aphasia: Limitations of the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination

Department of Neurology, Campus University Hospital, Lomé-Togo,
Nervous System Research Team, University of Lomé, Lomé-Togo
Department of Neurology, Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital, Lomé-Togo,
Department of Neurology, Kara University Hospital, Kara-Togo.

*Corresponding author: Nyinèvi Komla Anayo, Department of Neurology, Campus University Hospital, Lomé-Togo. anayokomla2@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Anayo NK, Apetse K, Guinhouya KM, Agba L, Assogba K, Balogou A. Post-stroke aphasia: Limitations of the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2025;16:S36-40. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_422_2024

Abstract

Objectives:

Stroke is a major international public health issue and is the leading cause of aphasia. The Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (BDAE) is one of the most widely used tools for assessing aphasia by speech and language therapists (SLTs). The general aim of this study was to describe the limitations of using the BDAE by SLTs in Togo, with a view to making suggestions for adaptation.

Materials and Methods:

This was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study of (SLTs) practicing in Lomé, Togo, who had followed aphasic stroke patients from June to July 2022. The target population of our study is all SLTs practicing in Togo, and the source population, SLTs practicing in Lomé. We surveyed a total of 35 SLTs in Lomé. We used an interview guide to gather information from them. Free and informed consent was obtained from them and limitations in adapting the BDAE were raised and noted. All the data were entered in the Excel file and transposed into the STATA software to facilitate the statistical processing of the results. The results were presented in the form of averages with standard deviations for quantitative variables and proportions for qualitative variables. Chi-square and Student’s t-tests are used for the different variables.

Results:

We surveyed 35 SLTs out of 38 present in Lomé, that is, 92.11% of cases. We noted a male predominance with a sex ratio (M/F) of 3.38. The study showed that the BDAE was the tool most frequently used by SLTs to assess aphasic patients, in 91% of cases. On the other hand, almost half (48.57%) of professionals use it only infrequently but the use they make of it is also heterogeneous. SLTs face a number of obstacles in using the BDAE, including language barriers (46.87%), patients’ general condition (80%), patients’ low level of education (68.75%), and the unsuitability of certain items (43.75%). In addition to the reasons given above, there were personal choices, the patient’s failures on simple items, and the long test-taking time.

Conclusion:

The majority of SLTs use the BDAE to assess aphasic patients. Several limitations of the BDAE tests were revealed by SLTs practicing in Lomé, Togo’s cosmopolitan capital, with a view to making suggestions for adaptation.

Keywords

Aphasia
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination
Speech therapists
Stroke
Togo

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is a major international public health issue, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). It is the leading cause of acquired physical disability, and the second leading cause of dementia and mortality (WHO: Stroke, October 2023). The sensory-motor sequelae of stroke have serious occupational and socio-economic consequences, especially in young people, including aphasia. Aphasia is a disturbance of the linguistic code, affecting the production and/or comprehension of oral and/or written language (National Institute for Science and Medical Research: Cerebrovascular accident. The leading cause of acquired disability in adults, 2019); (Order of Speech-Language Pathologists and audiologist: aphasia. https://www.ooaq.qc.ca) and there are several varieties of aphasia according to some authors.[1,2] It is mainly caused by strokes, the frequency of which in 2015 was 49.4% in Togo. This pathology is at the root of a psychological and functional catastrophe for the subject and his or her family, which can lead to social withdrawal.[3,4]

A speech-language pathology assessment is then essential to establish the diagnosis and determine the need for speech-language therapy (Order of Speech-Language Pathologists and audiologist : aphasia ; www.ooaq.qc.ca): (L’aphasie. https://www.ooaq.qc.ca). This requires the use of standardized tests, which may or may not be calibrated. Test administration takes into account the patient’s socio-cultural and linguistic context. The Protocole Montréal Toulouse (MT86) and the BDAE (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination) are the reference tests most commonly used to diagnose aphasia in France[5-7] and in Africa, more specifically in Togo.

The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) is one of the most commonly used aphasia batteries. The latest edition has undergone major revisions since its initial publication in 1972, but evidence of its validity is lacking.[7,8] Information on performance in the general population is, however, limited. Thus, many researchers in various countries are often faced with the difficulty of using tests developed in foreign languages and standardized for populations in other countries, particularly in the fields of neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. This prompted Brazilian, Spanish authors and health professionals to carry out several studies adapting these tests to their socio-cultural reality.[9,10] Brazilian researchers analyzed the performance of a sample of the Brazilian population subjected to a translated and adapted version of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE).

All these tools and tests used by Togolese speech and language therapists (SLTs) to assess patients are mostly imported, and therefore of occidental culture. This fact could therefore constitute a biasing factor in the objective diagnosis, resulting in an inefficient care plan for the patient. However, in Togo, few studies have been carried out on the limitations of these test batteries in the assessment of post-stroke aphasia patients. Our research question was whether the BDAE test items are suitable for assessing aphasic stroke patients. We, therefore, hypothesized whether around 80% of SLTs feel that the items in this test have limitations in the assessment of aphasic patients in our context. The general aim was to describe the limitations of using the BDAE test by SLTs in Togo in the management of stroke patients, with a view to making suggestions for adaptation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in Lomé, the capital and main city of Togo. It is located in the extreme south-west of the country, along the coast of the Gulf of Guinea. In demographic terms, Lomé was estimated to have a population of around 1.8 million in 2020. It is characterized by its extreme youthfulness, with the under-15 s accounting for 37.67%, the under-25 s for 57.74%, and the over-60 s for just 4.49%. Culturally, Lomé is a cosmopolitan capital where many languages are spoken, the main one being Mina.[11] This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study conducted over a 2-month period from June to July 2022. The target population of our study is all SLTs practicing in Togo, and the source population, SLTs practicing in Lomé in the public, private, and parapublic sectors, such as Lomé National School for Medical Auxiliaries. The non-probabilistic method using the reasoned choice technique was used to survey 35 SLTs in Lomé. Those who refused to participate in the survey were excluded from the study. We collected information from SLTs using a semi-directive interview technique. An interview guide was developed for this purpose and covered three themes: The use of the BDAE by SLTs, the difficulties encountered in administering it and unsuitable tests/items. The data were processed, analyzed, and entered into Microsoft Office 2019. Later, all data entered in the Excel file were transposed into STATA software to facilitate statistical realizations. The results were presented in the form of averages with standard deviations for quantitative variables and proportions for qualitative variables. Excel was also used to present the results and word to enter the entire document.

The statistical tests used are Chi-square for qualitative variables and Student’s T for quantitative variables. The Chi-square test is used to compare percentages between several independent groups, while the Student’s t-test is used to compare means with their variances or standard deviations between two groups with a normal distribution and a significant result was obtained if P-value is < 0.05.

RESULTS

We surveyed 35 SLTs out of 38 working in Lomé, representing a proportion of 92.11% with a 95% confidence interval. We noted a predominance of males, with a sex ratio (M/F) of 03.38. According to their experiences, more SLTs (28.57%) have between 9 and 12 years’ professional experience; 22.86% have been practicing for at least 15 years or more compared with those in the 0–3 and 6–9 age groups (17.14%). Few have professional experience between 3–6 (8.57%) and 12–15 (5.71%) years [Figure 1]. The majority of SLTs (82.86%) work in the public sector, compared with 17.14% in private and parapublic centers such as Ecole Nationale des Auxiliaires Médicaux de Lomé (ENAM-Lomé). The majority (91.43%) of SLTs use the BDAE to assess aphasic patients with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), in contrast, less than half (42.86%) use informal tools, only 14.29% of SLTs use the MT86. SLTs that use BDAE make heterogeneous use of it, so 48.57% use it infrequently. About 31.43% use it moderately frequently, and 11.43% use it frequently. Patients’ general condition, language barriers, and low level of education were identified by SLTs as barriers to BDAE use. Conversation and spontaneous language, verbal discrimination, picture naming, command execution, recitation, and singing were the items most unsuitable in our context, according to many SLTs [Table 1]. The items “cactus, clover, and cone” were raised by many more respondents as being unsuitable in 90% of cases. In the order execution test, the “floor” and “ceiling” items were the ones mentioned by respondents as unsuitable for Togo’s socio-cultural context. Most SLTs considered these four recitation items unsuitable for the Togolese context and all of them were convinced that the two singing test items were inadequate, as were the logic and reasoning items [Table 2].

Distribution of speech and language therapists by years of professional experience in Lomé in 2022.
Figure 1:
Distribution of speech and language therapists by years of professional experience in Lomé in 2022.
Table 1: The reasons for partial use of BDAE tests by speech and language therapists in Lomé in 2022.
Variables Number Percentage P-value
Patient’s general condition 28 80 0.05
Patient’s low level of education 22 68.75
Language barriers 15 46.87
Long runtime 6 18.75
Image naming 30 96.87
Verbal discrimination 31 96.87
Recitation 31 96.87
Singing 31 96.87

The results are statistically significant if P-value is < 0.05

Table 2: The main unsuitable BDAE items identified by the speech and language therapists in Lomé in 2022.
Variables Number Percentage P-value
Cactus 31 96.87 0.04
Clover 31 96.87
Cane 30 93.75
Order items
  Plancher 26 81.25 0.05
  Ceiling 7 21.86
Singing items
  Brother Jacques 31 96.87 0.05
  In the moonlight 31 96.87
Recitation items
  Stealing an egg 26 81.25 0.05
  Laugh, will laugh 27 84.37
  Don’t run 31 96.87
  Rolling stone 31 96.87

DISCUSSION

This discussion focuses on the following points: Achieving objectives, the limits of the study and the interpretation and comparison of the main results with other studies. The general aim of this study was to describe the limitations of the use of the BDAE by SLTs with a view to making proposals for its adaptation. The BDAE is a neuropsychological test designed to diagnose aphasia and related disorders. Developed by Goodglass and Kaplan in 1972, it can be used by neurologists, psychologists, SLTs, and occupational therapists.[12] Several editions of the BDAE have been developed in the world and each nation adapts it to its own socio-cultural and linguistic contexts.[8,9] The interview technique was the one used to collect data from the study population. However, only SLTs residing in Lomé were interviewed as such and are therefore not representative of all SLTs in Togo. This could bias the data and consequently the results and is therefore a limitation of our study. However, our results are very interesting and have enabled us to compare our data with those in the literature. The paucity of the general literature must be emphasized, as little research has been carried out on this issue. The second stage of our study would be the applicability of the proposals made by SLTs to the general population, to better adapt these tools to our socio-cultural context. In our study, we noted a predominance of men, with a sex ratio of 3.38, which contrasts with data in the literature.[13,14] For some authors, speech therapy is a caring and supportive profession that generally attracts women such care jobs are predominantly held by women for socio-historical reasons, according to Hobson and Lister in 2002 and Poulin-Dubois in 2006.[13,14] We can explain this male predominance in our study by the cohabitation of physiotherapy and SLTs schools. Many men choose physiotherapy as a physical profession when they sit the entrance exam and if the entrance examination to physiotherapy school does not work out for some candidates, they choose speech therapy by ricochet. What’s more, it’s a profession that’s little-known to the general public in our country because it is a new profession. The majority of SLTs (28.57%) had between 09 and 12 years’ professional experience in our study and this is a positive aspect. Indeed, a great deal of experience on the part of SLTs would enable them to judge the tests used and to identify any difficulties. Respondents use very significantly (P < 0.05) the BDAE more than the MT86 because, for them, the BDAE is accessible and comprehensive, and, it enables all aspects of oral and written language to be assessed. BDAE is straightforward in terms of assessing the level of language performance and the severity of language disorders, compared with other tests. Our data are similar to those of Detante O who reported similar results in Aphasia Handicap Score in 2012[4] and Spreen and Risser[15]. However, despite this accessibility, the BDAE was used with varying frequency by SLTs. In fact, almost half (48.57%) used it infrequently, while 11.43% used it frequently. This variable frequency of use is thought to be linked to limitations in the use of the BDAE, such as language barriers (46.87%), the low educational level of aphasics (68.75%), and the length of time taken to complete the test (18.75%). The authors report that education had a significant impact on most BDAE subtests. In their study, a stepwise regression model showed that education best predicted variance in BDAE scores with low (<15%) to modest (>17%) but significant (P < 0.01) ability.[9,16] Akashi and Ortiz found that education had a different effect on performance for each of the language skills.[16] Language barriers are difficulties encountered by the SLTs surveyed in our study because when the patient does not have the required skills to write or read, but has a facility of expression in French, only the oral domain can be assessed. As reported by authors, a limited command of written language therefore constitutes a failure to pass the test. The authors point out that language barriers have a significant impact on BDAE subtypes.[9,17,18] SLTs are limited in their communicative interactions with their patients when they do not understand their local language. This obliges SLTs to seek out a mediator to promote exchanges with his patient, as confirmed by Moukrim, Gonzalez, Pereira and Ortiz.[18-20] The authors reported that people with no formal education/illiteracy performed worse than people with little education in some language tasks of the Montreal-Toulouse Language-Brazilian battery, suggesting that each year of education has an impact on cognitive-language performance. In our study, the patient’s general condition was a difficulty noted by 80% of the SLTs because the aphasia is a consequence of stroke in 25–40% of cases so associated often with the bad general condition, as reported by the Ordre des orthophonistes et audiologistes du Québec and Balogou and Belo[3] We report in this study that the duration of the BDAE test is a constraint for the respondents in most cases. Hence, the average duration of the BDAE, which is 90 min, prevents some SLTs from taking advantage of all its tests, as has been widely reported by Mohr, Courrier et al., Stefaniak et al.[7,21,22] As previously mentioned, the BDAE consists of oral and written language tests. The majority of SLTs found that the verbal discrimination, recitation, singing, and picture naming tests were considered the most unsuitable in 96.87% of cases. They are difficult to apply in Togo’s socio-cultural context, because most standardized assessment tools are developed in a Western context. Several authors have reported that body part naming and handwriting mechanics scores decreased significantly in the low socioeconomic group.[9,22] Our data concur with Alikekere’s work on the limitations of the BDAE in 2019 (Alikekere S. Study of test limits of Boston Diagnostic Examination of Aphasia [BDAE] in Togo, speech therapy dissertation; ENAM-Lomé; 2019. p. 56), those of Kore in his work on the limitations of MT86 in 2006 (Kore K A. Using MT86 in Togo: Assessment of the limits to the possibility of adapting part of the protocol; speech therapy dissertation; ENAM-Lomé; 2006. p. 63.), and those of Ezzedine in his work on the adaptation of the bilingual aphasia test (BAT) in 2017 (Ezzeddine N. Adaptation of the BAT [Version Courte] to Lebanese: Linguistic and psychometric data; Toulouse. 2017). Several items were raised by many respondents as being unsuited to our socio-cultural realities. Among these, we have the items “cactus,” “clover,” and “cone.” Our data are similar to the Alikekere data. Singing items such as “au clair de la lune” and “frères jacques” are not adapted as reported by Bouchard et al.[23] and Biwu M.[24] Indeed, the songs “jacques brothers…” and “in the moonlight...” are nursery rhymes that little French children learn as early as kindergarten but this is not the case in Togo. These songs are not widely known, even if a few have mastered the melody of the song “frères jacques...,” which is similar to that of the song “à l’école” taught to children as soon as they start school. These two songs therefore deserve to be adapted to Togo’s socio-cultural context. The BDAE tests need to be revised and adapted to our socio-cultural context. Other studies should be carried out among the population to apply the suggestions arising from this first study.

CONCLUSION

At the end of this study, we note that the BDAE is the tool most frequently used by SLTs to assess aphasic patients. On the other hand, professionals use it with varying frequency, most often due to difficulties in passing it on to patients. Their use is heterogeneous. Some use the tests exclusively, in full or in part, while others vary their use. We have identified four main difficulties faced by SLTs in using the BDAE: Language barriers, patients’ general state of health, patients’ low level of education, and the unsuitability of certain items. All these BDAE tests and items require adaptation for proper assessment. It is therefore essential that further studies be carried out on the population to apply these suggestions to a better management strategy for aphasic patients.

Acknowledgments:

The authors sincerely thank the editors and all willing reviewers of this manuscript. We have tried to incorporate as many corrections as possible. We remain open for further information.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required. The research/study complied with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study. But all the speech and language therapists gave verbal informed consent to participate in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . A review of conduction aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010;10:499-503.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Developmental conduction aphasia after neonatal stroke. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:664-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Recent epidemiology of stroke in Togo. Rev Neurol. 2015;171:A235-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Aphasia handicap score In: Neurosciences. Paris: Pierre and Marie Curie University; . p. :14-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Early aphasia rehabilitation is associated with functional reactivation of the left inferior frontal gyrus: A pilot study. Stroke. 2014;45:545-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Cortical reorganization after rehabilitation in a patient with conduction aphasia using high-density EEG. Appl Sci. 2020;10:5281.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Neuroplasticity and functional recovery after intensive language therapy in chronic post stroke aphasia: Which factors are relevant? Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:332.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . The factor structure of the boston diagnostic aphasia examination, third edition. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019;25:772-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . The boston diagnostic aphasia examination-Spanish version: The influence of demographic variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:802-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Performance of a brazilian population sample in the boston diagnostic aphasia examination: A pilot study. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2002;35:305-17.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. . Library and archives department: Discover the city of Lome. . Available from: https://bul_l@univ-lome.tg [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 08]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . The assessment of aphasia and related disorders Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Contested concepts in gender and social politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002:23-54.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. . The development of the concept of “gender”: beyond the innate/acquired debate. Child Dev. 2006;58:213-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Assessment of Aphasia Oxford: Oxford University Press; . p. :25-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Formal language assessment in low-educated healthy subjects. Dement Neuropsychol. 2018;12:284-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Structure factorielle de l'examen diagnostique de l'aphasie de Boston, troisième édition. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019;25:772-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. . Language barriers and communication problems in healthcare settings In: The linguistic integration of adult migrants: some lessons from research. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; . p. :337-344.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Profils linguistiques des variantes de l'aphasie progressive primaire. J Commun Disord. 2022;97:106202.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Language skills differences between adults without formal education and low formal education. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022;35:4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Speech therapy dictionary In: Evaluation. 4thed. France: Ortho Edition; . p. :435.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;16:43-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Psychometric analysis of assessment tools used with francophone children. Can J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol. 2009;33:129-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. . Proposed adaptation of 48 items unsuitable the MT86 to the Togolese context; speech-language pathology dissertation Lomé: ENAM-Lomé; . p. :62.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections