Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
14 (
3
); 432-439
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_30_2023

Pathways to care for substance use treatment among tribal patients at a psychiatric hospital: A comparative study

Department of Psychiatric Social Work, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Corresponding author: Dr. Prasad Kannekanti, Department of Psychiatric Social Work, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. reddysriprasad@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Balan A, Kannekanti P, Khanra S. Pathways to care for substance use treatment among tribal patients at a psychiatric hospital: A comparative study. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2023;14:432-9.

Abstract

Objectives:

According to the national mental health survey, substance use disorders (SUDs) are prevalent in 22.4% of the population above 18 years, whereas the same is 26% among the tribal population. The treatment gap is also high in substance-addictive disorders. Our study aimed to compare the severity of substance use, pathways to psychiatric care, and treatment-seeking behavior among the tribal and non-tribal populations.

Materials and Methods:

The study was conducted at a tertiary psychiatric teaching institute in India. It was a cross-sectional comparative study. Patients fulfilling the International Classification of Disease 10 diagnostic criteria of mental and behavioral disorders due to substance use, with active dependence, were taken without comorbidity. Forty patients in tribal and non-tribal groups were recruited with consecutive sampling. The samples were assessed with a semi-structured interview schedule, addiction severity index, attitudes toward help-seeking, and pathways-to-care.

Results:

Excessive substance use median was for 7.00 (± 5.00) years in tribal and 6.00 (± 4.00) years in non-tribal; in tribal, substance intake was younger than non-tribal (P = 0.167), and general health-care system more distance than the non-tribal (P < 0.001). Around 65% of the persons with SUD never consulted their general practitioner and primary health-care facilities. Alcohol severity was higher in the tribal population than in the non-tribal population. The cannabis and opioid severity was high in the non-tribal population. Help-seeking behavior was deficient in both groups.

Conclusion:

Most of the substance abuse tribal and non-tribal populations reach healthcare very late and do not consider it as a health issue initially. The major reason for the delayed pathway is a lack of awareness about mental health care facilities and stigma in both populations. The stigma is high in non-tribal communities compared to the tribal community. There is a need to improve the identification and treatment of alcohol morbidity in primary care.

Keywords

Pathways
Substance
Tribal
Indigenous
Addiction

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a considerable burden affecting significant sections of society. According to a national mental health survey (2015–2016), SUDs contributed mainly by alcohol and tobacco were more in middle-aged individuals among males in rural areas. SUDs are prevalent in 22.4% of the population above 18 years in all the states in India. The recent national survey on substance use has found a high magnitude of substance use prevalence in the country. The current prevalence of alcohol use was 14.6%, while other substances were found to be prevalent. The prevalence of cannabis (2.8%), opioids (2.1%), and sedatives (1.08%) were found to be high in India.[1] According to the 2011 census, India consists of 8.6% of the tribal population in total population; The tribal population is a marginalized community and lives relatively in isolation with poor socioeconomic and poorer health indices.[2]

The treatment gap is higher in SUDs than in other psychiatric disorders. Help-seeking and access to treatment are only 25%; there is an 86% treatment gap in alcohol use disorders. Accessibility to health-care services and attitudes toward professional treatment vary according to different populations.[3] Moreover, the prevalence of alcohol and tobacco is higher in rural and tribal populations than in urban areas due to various sociocultural reasons.[4-6] The previous studies on pathways to care for SUD do not focus on any ethnic community and are specific to opioid dependence only from India.[7,8] Hence, this study aimed to examine the pathway of care, attitude to seek professional help, and treatment delay for substance use among tribal patients and compare those with non-tribal patients at a tertiary psychiatric hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institute ethics committee. It was a hospital-based, cross-sectional, and comparative study. The hospital is in a state whose population consists of 26.21% of tribes.[9] The inclusion criteria were (1) age of more than 18 years, (2) seeking treatment from the outpatient department of addiction psychiatry unit of the hospital on Wednesday, and Saturday except government holidays, (3) diagnosed with mental and behavioral disorder due to use of psychoactive substances as per international classification of disease-10th version by the World Health Organization (WHO, 1993) criteria, and (4) providing informed consent. Patients those (1) were diagnosed with psychiatric comorbidity and (2) were not accompanied by any family member were excluded from the study. Belonging to tribes was recorded by self-report during registration at the outpatient department as per the hospital outpatient registration policy. Every first tribal and non-tribal patient fulfilling inclusion criteria was included in the study using a consecutive sampling technique. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data were collected between August 2021 and February 2022. The sample consisted of 40 each from tribal and non-tribal treatment-seeking populations. The following tools were administered –

Measures

  1. A semi-structured interview schedule has been used to collect the socio-demographic details of the participants. It consists of basic sociodemographic data. In addition, information has been collected regarding the substance use pattern.

  2. Addiction severity index[10] (ASI) is used to screen for the screening and assess the severity of substance use. The ASI is a semi-structured interview designed to address seven potential problem areas in substance-abusing patients: Medical status, employment and support, drug use, alcohol use, legal status, family/social status, and psychiatric status.

  3. “WHO pathway to care proforma”[11] is semi-structured interview schedule, an adapted version of the WHO encounter form of pathways to psychiatric care used to assess the delay in accessing psychiatric care.

  4. Attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help scale[12] is a 10-item self-report used to assess attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help. Higher scores represent positive attitudes.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM-SPSS) version 25 for Windows. Shapiro–Wilk test considered for checking normality. The statistical method has been determined based on the test of normality.

RESULTS

The median age of the tribal patient group was higher 31.00 (14.75) (Mean = 32.60 ± 9.23) years, while that of the non-tribal patients’ group was 26.50 (14.00) (Mean = 28.87 ± 8.29) years (P = 0.071). The majority of tribal patient group hailed from rural compared to the non-tribal group (P = 0.025). Furthermore, There was a difference in the distance of the nearest general health-care system between tribal and non-tribal populations, tribal group patients had to travel longer to access the general health care system (P = 0.051). The distance to a psychiatric health-care system is high in both populations. [Table 1] Compares sociodemographic characteristics between two groups.

Table 1: Comparison of sample characteristics between tribal patients and non-tribal patients groups (n=80).
Sociodemographic characteristics Groups χ2/Fishers exact test/mann whitney U P
Tribal group n=40 (%) Non-tribal group n=40 (%)
Age (in years), median (IQR) 31.00 (14.75) 26.50 (14.00) 612.50 0.071
Mean rank 45.19 35.81
Education (in years), median (IQR) 10.00 (5.50) 12.00 (4.75) 712.50 0.397
Mean rank 38.31 42.69
Religion 2.581 0.108
Hindu 28 (70.0) 34 (85.0)
Others 12 (30.0) 6 (15.0)
Domicile 5.000 0.025*
Rural 25 (62.5) 15 (37.5)
Urban/semi urban 15 (37.5) 25 (62.5)
Family 0.054 0.816
Nuclear 25 (62.5) 26 (65.0)
Joint/extended 15 (37.5) 14 (35.0)
Occupation 0.626f 0.913
Employed 17 (42.5) 14 (35.0)
Daily wage 10 (25.0) 11 (27.5)
Unemployed 10 (25.0) 11 (27.5)
Others 3 (7.5) 4 (10.0)
Family monthly income 3.447 0.178
<10000 14 (35.0) 9 (22.5)
11000–20000 12 (30.0) 20 (50.0)
>20000 14 (35.0) 11 (27.5)
Excessive use of substance use 7.00 (5.00) 6.00 (4.00) 599.00 0.051
(in years), median (IQR) Mean rank 45.33 35.48
When did you start substance intake (in years), median (IQR) Mean rank 17.00 (4.00) 18.00 (5.75) 656.50 0.167
36.91 44.09
Distance to a general health-care system (in kilometers), Median (IQR) 4.00 (3.00) 2.00 (1.75) 355.50 0.001***
Mean rank 51.61 29.39
Distance to a psychiatric health care system (in kilometers), median (IQR) 15.0 (90.00) 19.0 (72.25) 755.00 0.663
Mean rank 41.63 39.38

f: Fisher’s exact test, IQR: Interquartile range. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001

Addiction severity for alcohol severity was significantly higher in the tribal patients (P = 0.008) and the same for the illicit drugs (cannabinoids, and opioids) was high in the non-tribal patients (P = 0.035). Family issues were higher in tribal patients (P = 0.013) [Table 2].

Table 2: Comparison of addiction severity between tribal patients and non-tribal patients group (n=80).
Domain Response Groups Fisher exact test statistics P
Tribal group
n=40 (%)
Non-tribal group
n=40 (%)
Medical No problem 36 (90.0) 38 (95.0) 2.165 0.870
Slight problem 2 (5.0) 00
Moderate problem 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5)
Severe problem 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5)
Extreme problem 00 00
Employment No problem 13 (32.5) 21 (52.5) 5.659 0.126
Slight problem 6 (15.0) 2 (5.0)
Moderate problem 15 (37.5) 15 (37.5)
Severe problem 6 (15.0) 2 (5.0)
Extreme problem 00 00
Alcohol No problem 4 (10.0) 17 (42.5) 11.189 0.008**
Slight problem 3 (7.0) 2 (5.0)
Moderate problem 7 (17.5) 5 (12.5)
Severe problem 26 (65.0) 16 (40.0)
Extreme problem 00 00
Drug (cannabis, and opiods) No problem 25 (62.5) 13 (32.5) 7.786 0.035*
Slight problem 2 (5.0) 3 (7.5)
Moderate problem 2 (5.0) 2 (5.0)
Severe problem 11 (27.5) 22 (55.0)
Extreme problem 00 00
Legal No problem 40 (100) 40 (100)
Slight problem 00 00
Moderate problem 00 00
Severe problem 00 00
Extreme problem 00 00
Family No problem 1 (2.5) 5 (12.5) 10.380 0.013*
Slight problem 8 (20.0) 18 (45.0)
Moderate problem 26 (65.0) 14 (35.0)
Severe problem 5 (12.5) 3 (7.5)
Extreme problem 00 00
Psychiatry No problem 2 (5.0) 2 (5.0) 3.834 0.268
Slight problem 23 (57.5) 30 (75.0)
Moderate problem 13 (32.5) 8 (20.0)
Severe problem 2 (5.0) 00
Extreme problem 00 00
P<0.05, **P<0.01

In both groups, family members noticed the problem first. In the tribal group, spouses mostly noticed the changes among patients, while the same for non-tribal group parents (P = 0.020). In both groups, parents and spouses commonly recognized the need for psychiatric care. In tribal groups, siblings also recognized the same (P = 0.028). Referral from the general health-care system is very minimal in both groups. Time passed to identify patient problems since its onset was longer in the tribal patient group (P = 0.002), and both groups have minute differences on treatment gap to access the psychiatric care. [Table 3] describes and compares the pathways of care between the two groups.

Table 3: Comparison of pathways to psychiatric care between tribal patients and non-tribal patient group (n=80).
Variables Response category Groups χ2/fisher exact test statistics/mann whitney U P
Tribal group
n=40(%)
Non- tribal group
n=40(%)
Person who noticed the change Parents 15 (37.5) 21 (52.5) 10.269f 0.020*
Sibling 8 (20.0) 1 (2.5)
Spouse 16 (40.0) 12 (30.0)
Relatives 00 2 (5.0)
Others 1 (2.5) 4 (10.0)
Person who recognized as it
is a mental problem
Parents 13 (32.5) 17 (42.5) 4.746f 0.312
Sibling 8 (20.0) 2 (5.0)
Spouse 13 (32.5) 15 (37.5)
Relatives 2 (5.0) 1 (2.5)
Others 4 (10.0) 5 (12.5)
Who recognized need for
psychiatric care
Parents 14 (35.0) 18 (45.0) 10.315f 0.028*
Sibling 8 (20.0) 00
Spouse 11 (27.5) 11 (27.5)
Relatives 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5)
Others 6 (15.0) 8 (20.0)
Caregivers who were spends maximum time with patient
for care giving
Parents 11 (27.5) 18 (35.0) 4.073f 0.215
Spouse 21 (52.5) 14 (35.0)
Sibling 8 (20.0) 7 (17.5)
Others 00 1 (2.5)
Source of referral General physician 8 (20.0) 4 (10.0) 8.208f 0.379
Family members 10 (25.0) 12 (30.0)
Relatives 11 (27.5) 10 (25.0)
Neighbors 9 (22.5) 6 (15.0)
Others 1 (2.5) 3 (7.5)
More than one referral 1 (2.5) 1 (2.5)
Mental health professional 00 4 (10.0)
Reason for shift from one mode of treatment to other Increase illness 4 (10.0) 5 (12.5) 4.941f 0.418
Deterioration in previous
state or no improvement
2 (5.0) 5 (12.5)
For better improvement 2 (5.0) 2 (5.0)
Relapse of symptoms 6 (15.0) 5 (12.5)
Not applicable 26 (65.0) 23 (57.5)
Shifting modality Faith healing to
psychiatric treatment
9 (22.5) 7 (17.5) 2.799f 0.637
Faith healing along with
psychiatric treatment
00 1 (2.5)
General physician to
psychiatrist
3 (7.5) 4 (10.0)
De-addiction center to
psychiatric care
2 (5.0) 5 (12.5)
Directly come to CIP 26 (65.0) 23 (57.5)
First modality of treatment Faith healer 9 (22.5) 7 (17.5) 1.144f 0.827
Psychiatrist 26 (65.0) 25 (62.5)
General physician 3 (7.5) 4 (10.0)
De addiction 2 (5.0) 4 (10.0)
When did you identify patient problem at first time (in years) median (IQR)
Mean rank
5.00 (3.00)
48.34
3.00 (3)
32.66
486.50 0.002**
Time gap to access psychiatric care after (in years), median (IQR)
Mean rank
2.0 (3.0)
40.25
2.0 (2.0)
40.75
790.00 0.923

f: Fisher’s exact test, SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range. *P<0.05, **P<0.01

The reason for treatment delay was comparable between groups. It was found that lack of proper awareness about psychiatric treatment place and person, financial problems, problems in taking the patient to mental health facilities, poorly functional social networks low social support to family were higher among tribal patients [Table 4]. On comparison of attitude stoward seeking professional psychological help, both groups have a relatively poor attitude toward seeking psychological help in [Table 5].

Table 4: Comparison of the reason for treatment delay in seeking psychiatric care between tribal and non-tribal population (n=80).
Domain Response category Response Groups χ2 P
P (df=1)
Tribal n=40(%) Non-tribal n=40(%)
Reason for treatment delay in seeking psychiatric care Lack of proper awareness about psychiatric treatment place and person Illiteracy

Residing in remote and in accessible place Financial problem

Remained busy in other important activity

Fear of social stigma and isolation
Problem in taking patient to mental health facilities/severity of symptoms
Poorly functional social network low social support to family
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
Present
Absent
24 (60.0)
16 (40)
4 (10)
36 (90)
2 (5.0)
38 (95.0)
8 (20.0)
32 (80.0)
8 (20.0)
32 (80.0)
15 (37.5)
25 (62.5)
21 (52.5)
19 (47.5)
3 (7.5)
37 (92.5)
18 (45.0)
22 (55)
3 (7.5)
37 (92.5)
1 (2.5)
39 (97.5)
6 (15.0)
34 (85.0)
9 (22.5)
31 (77.5)
17 (42.5)
23 (57.5)
13 (32.5)
27 (67.5)
1 (2.5)
39 (97.5)
1.805

0.155

0.342

0.346

0.075

0.208

3.274

0.342
0.179

0.284

0.380

0.556

0.785

0.648

0.070

0.380
Table 5: Comparison of attitude toward seeking professional psychological help between tribal and non-tribal population.
Domain Groups t(df=78) P
Tribal group n=40 Non-Tribal group n=40
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Attitude towards psychological help seeking 14.15 (3.29) 15.47 (3.00) −1.880 0.064

SD: Standard deviation

DISCUSSION

The pattern of substance use was different in the two groups. Compared to the previous studies, the tribal were less educated, and most of them were engaged in agricultural activities and came from low socioeconomic conditions.[5] In the case of occupation, the findings contradict previous studies.[5,13] The prevalence of alcohol use was high in tribal individuals with low occupational and uneducated. The comparable age of initiation of substance use lower in tribal patients is consistent with earlier studies.[5,14] Both groups had moderate problems in employment, but the tribal population reported more severe problems than the non-tribal populations. The alcohol and other illicit drugs opioids and cannabinoids showed a significant difference between the groups. The previous studies also show that the prevalence of alcohol use is high in tribal populations.[2,15-18] However, in the non-tribal population, most of them have illicit drugs use in high severity. The severity of family/social problems were higher in tribal populations, and it leads to various negative consequences in families such as domestic violence, family discord, and burden on spouses.[17,19]

Very few studies systematically assessed the pathways to care among persons diagnosed with SUDs in India. These studies were conducted with alcohol use disorders[19] and opioid use disorders.[7,21] Globally, common pathways fall under three categories, physician, specialist, and traditional healer.[22] In the present study, the most common pathway was the delayed pathway, which takes years to seek psychiatric help after recognizing the symptoms of family members. In our study, the mean duration taken to access psychiatric services after identifying the problem was 2 years in the tribal population. The comparison of the duration of the problem identified for the first time between the two groups was significant. This could be because the caregivers do not think substance intake is a problem, and in tribal, they accept it as part of the culture. In others, studies about psychiatric disorders to look at the generic pathway to psychiatric care found a more significant delay between the onset of first symptoms and seeking the first health care with a mean delay of 2.8 years.[23]

Noticing the change most commonly by spouses instead of by parents in the tribal group despite early onset of substance use, unlike in non-tribal group, might reflect more familial and cultural acceptance. Here, the direct pathway is more among tribal and non-tribal populations than two-step referral pathways. Earlier studies have expressed the strong possibility of pathways to care differences based on the psychiatric diagnosis. A study conducted in North India reported that 58% of patients with mental illness and SUDs are to be consulted a psychiatrist for the first time for treatment.[24] Despite that, 33% of the patients sought help from traditional faith healers for the treatment primarily. In the index study, 65.0% of patients from the tribal population consulted a psychiatrist, including whoever directly comes to central institute of psychiatry (CIP), and 62.5% from the non-tribal population directly consulted a psychiatrist for the SUD. In a previous study, 56.9% of the subjects had the first point of contact with a tertiary care addiction psychiatrist, and traditional healers were consulted by about 5.2% of the patients seeking help for the first time.[20] No patients visited a practitioner of an alternate system of medicine in the present study. This was also comparable to the earlier study.[25] It shows that most patients with SUDs do not seek treatment from alternate systems of medicine. This observation has an important implication for policies as, over the past years, there has been prominence on the promotion of alternate systems of medicine in the country. In India, the treatment provided by non-specialists for SUDs might be ineffective by patients; or non-specialists might prefer other disorders for the treatment rather than SUDs. In our study, fewer patients consulted faith healers as the first treatment mode compared to consulting a psychiatrist directly.

Most of the tribal population gave the reason for the delay in psychiatric care was a lack of proper awareness about psychiatric care (treatment, place, and person), and financial problems were another reason for delaying treatment. The previous studies and surveys substantiate the results. Most alcohol use disorders identified with the treatment gap had not been taken care of or could not access appropriate care. More than lack of awareness, affordability of care, which varied between rural and urban areas, appear s to influence these wide treatment gaps critically.[3] Fear and social stigma were considered major issues among non-tribal populations compared to the tribal population. A previous study reported high internalized stigma among alcohol-dependent patients.[26] Research has indicated that the differences in psychiatric disorders might explain the differences in the pathway of care.[24] Both groups have a poor attitude toward seeking professional psychological help. If the patient with higher education, they have a more positive attitude to seek professional help. Our findings show that respondents with higher education viewed them as more positive toward seeking psychological help. The treatment gap is high in substance abuse disorders and current community-based programs are not adequately reaching grassroots levels; all other important stakeholders need to be trained. Furthermore, programs for prevention and early detection measures are needed. Technology-based interventions need to reach unreached tribal populations. Even though pathways to care among tribal with SUD are not studied much, the sample size is inadequate to generalize to tribal communities, both genders could have been a better representation, and future studies need to address the treatment gaps with community-based interventions in tribal communities.

CONCLUSION

Pathways to care for patients diagnosed with SUDs represent a crucial link in health-care delivery for these disorders. In India, the situation appears to be less than satisfactory. There is a long-time gap between the onset of substance use-related problems and the first help-seeking attempt. Lack of awareness about the health-care facility, problems taking patients to mental health facilities/ severity of symptoms was high in tribal population, social stigma and fear reported by non-tribal population for delayed psychiatric care, and financial problems were also reasons to delay seeking psychiatric care. Attitude toward seeking psychological help is low in both groups. This study adds to the scant literature on treatment-seeking behavior characteristics among tribal patients with SUD and would provide insight both at individual and policy-making levels.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . On behalf of the group of investigators for the national survey on extent and pattern of substance use in India In: Magnitude of Substance Use in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . A cross sectional study of alcohol consumption among tribal and non-tribal adults of Narayanganj block in Mandla district of Madhya Pradesh, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;3:791-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . National Mental Health Survey of India 2015-16 Prevalence, Pattern and Outcomes. . NIMHANS Rep 2015-16. :1-198. Available from: https://www.indianmhs.nimhans.ac.in/docs/report2.pdf [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 01]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Tobacco use and nicotine dependency in a cross-sectional representative sample of 18,018 individuals in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:515.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Reasons for substance use: A comparative study of alcohol use in tribals and non-tribals. Indian J Psychol Med. 2012;34:242-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Predictors of substance use in the tribal population of Northeast India: Retrospective analysis of a cross-sectional survey. J Addict Res Ther. 2016;7:295.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Pathways to care and reasons for treatment-seeking behavior in patients with opioid dependence syndrome: An exploratory study. J Ment Health Hum Behav. 2019;24:8-14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . A study of pathways to care among opioid dependent individuals seeking treatment at a community de-addiction clinic in India. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2019;19:490-502.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Census of India. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner; . Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/ [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 04]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9:199-213.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. The pathways to psychiatric care: A cross-cultural study. Psychol Med. 1991;21:761-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Attitudes toward seeking professional psychologial help: A shortened form and considerations for research. J Coll Stud Dev. 1995;36:368-73.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . The association of selected sociodemographic factors and differences in patterns of substance use: A pilot study in selected areas of Northeast India. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38:1305-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Sequence of onset of different drug use among opiate addicts. Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11:600-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Prevalence of alcohol use among tribal population based on self-reported data: A hospital-based pilot study from West Bengal. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2018;19:269-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Association of religion and cultural tradition with alcohol use among some tribal communities of Arunachal Pradesh, India. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2019;18:296-308.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , . Factors associated with alcohol misuse among indigenous tribal men in Wayanad: A qualitative study. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41:516-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Prevalence and determinants of substance use among indigenous tribes in south India: Findings from a tribal household survey. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9:356-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Alcohol use and cultural change in an indigenous population: A case study from Venezuela. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37:603-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Pathways to care of alcohol-dependent patients: An exploratory study from a tertiary care substance use disorder treatment center. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;5:e30342.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . A study of pathways to care among opioid dependent individuals seeking treatment at a community de-addiction clinic in India. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020;19:490-502.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Pathway to psychiatric care in a tertiary mental health facility in Jaipur, India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2012;5:303-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Pathways to care: Duration of untreated psychosis from Karachi, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7409.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Help seeking behaviour of psychiatric patients before seeking care at a mental hospital. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2001;47:71-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Pathway of care among psychiatric patients attending a mental health institution in central India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:333-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Treatment gap, help-seeking, stigma and magnitude of alcohol use disorder in rural Ethiopia. Subst Abus Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14:4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections