Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_101_2025

Opercular syndrome (Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome) secondary to corona radiata stroke and polymicrogyria: A case report

Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth National Health Service Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Plymouth National Health Service Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

*Corresponding author: Jaisurya Jaisukhalal, Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth National Health Service Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom. j.jaisukhalal@nhs.net

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Jaisukhalal J, Noushad MA, D Silva JJ, Bhattacharjee M. Opercular syndrome (Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome) secondary to corona radiata stroke and polymicrogyria: A case report. J Neurosci Rural Pract. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_101_2025

Abstract

Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome (FCMS), or anterior opercular syndrome, is a rare form of orofacial paralysis that results from bilateral damage to the operculum involving the corticobulbar fibers of cranial nerves 5, 7, 9, 10, and 12. It manifests as paralysis in the voluntary movements performed by the facial, pharyngeal, lingual, and masticatory muscles, but with preserved reflexive movements involving the same group of muscles. This phenomenon is termed automatic-voluntary dissociation, a classical clinical feature observed in FCMS. We report the case of a 61-year-old man who developed an acute onset of anarthria and dysphagia. The clinical presentation, imaging findings, and preserved reflexive orofacial movements guided the final diagnosis. This case highlights a rare presentation of a disconnection syndrome involving corticobulbar pathways, emphasizing the importance of clinico-neuroradiological correlation in diagnosing FCMS in acute unilateral brain lesions.

Keywords

Automatic-voluntary dissociation
Disconnection syndrome
Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome
Operculum
Orofacial paralysis

INTRODUCTION

Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome (FCMS) was initially described by Magnus in the 19th century and further defined by Foix, Chavany, and Marie in 1926, hence the name of the disease. Anarthia and bilateral facio-linguovelopharyngeo-masticatory volitional paralysis with preserved reflexive facial movements are the clinical hallmark features of this condition.[1] Cerebrovascular disease is the most common cause; other important causes include central nervous system infections, neuronal migration disorders, and neurodegenerative conditions.[1] Although FCMS was rarely reported in the past, the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now led to prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Here, we discuss the case of a middle-aged man with an underlying asymptomatic chronic unilateral brain lesion clinically decompensating on the occurrence of an acute contralateral ischemic stroke to manifest a disconnection syndrome. This report emphasizes the need to look for clinically unapparent chronic brain lesions in the neuroimaging of a patient presenting with anarthria and dysphagia, which could contribute to accurately diagnosing FCMS.

CASE REPORT

Patient presentation and initial investigations

A 61-year-old male with a history of cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and paranoid personality disorder presented with the abrupt onset of cessation of speech output and difficulty swallowing. He had no prior focal neurological deficits, and there was no history of trauma or recent illness. On neurological examination, he was aphonic, but his verbal comprehension and reading perceptions were intact. He was able to answer simple questions with signs and writing. He was unable to open his mouth, protrude his tongue, show his teeth, chew, or swallow. Emotional facial expressions and reflexive movements of the face, such as smiling and yawning, were preserved as validated using observations made and documented by healthcare professionals during the patient’s interaction with his relatives and his facial response to funny matters. The limb muscle strengths were 5/5, deep tendon reflexes were normoactive, and coordination was normal, ruling out widespread motor involvement.

Initial investigations included routine blood tests, inflammatory markers, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, which were unremarkable [Table 1]. A brain MRI showed a left-sided corona radiata infarct and chronic right opercular polymicrogyria [Figures 1 and 2] suggesting an effective potential disruption of the left and the right corticobulbar pathways, respectively, raising suspicion of a rare neurologic syndrome named FCMS.

Table 1: Lab investigations.
Investigation Result Reference range
Full blood count 9.0 3.6–11.0×109/L
Urea 10.7 2.5–7.8 mmol/L
Sodium 144 133–146 mmol/L
Potassium 4.1 3.5–5.3 mmol/L
C-reactive protein 14 mg/L 0.1–5 mg/L
Liver function tests Alkaline phosphatase 141 IU/L 30–130 IU/L
HbA1c 33 mmol/mol <42 mmol/mol
Plasma viscosity 1.70 mPa.s 1.48–1.72 mPa.s
Thyroid stimulating hormone 1.3 mIU/L 0.35–4.94 mIU/L
c-ANCA/p-ANCA Negative
Serum protein electrophoresis Negative
Antiganglioside antibodies Negative
Antinuclear antibody Negative
5-day Holter monitor study Normal

c-ANCA: Cytoplasmic pattern of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. p-ANCA: Perinuclear pattern of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody.

61-year-old man with Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome who presented with anarthria and dysphagia. (a) The diffusion-weighted image (B1000) shows restricted diffusion in the left corona radiata (purple arrow). (b) The corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient map shows restricted diffusion in the left corona radiata (purple arrow) in keeping with an acute infarct.
Figure 1:
61-year-old man with Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome who presented with anarthria and dysphagia. (a) The diffusion-weighted image (B1000) shows restricted diffusion in the left corona radiata (purple arrow). (b) The corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient map shows restricted diffusion in the left corona radiata (purple arrow) in keeping with an acute infarct.
61-year-old man with Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome who presented with anarthria and dysphagia. (a) The T2W image reveals extensive right frontal lobe cortical malformation with polymicrogyria (green arrow). (b) The T2W image shows the right frontal lobe cortical malformation with polymicrogyria extending to involve the right frontal operculum (green arrows).
Figure 2:
61-year-old man with Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome who presented with anarthria and dysphagia. (a) The T2W image reveals extensive right frontal lobe cortical malformation with polymicrogyria (green arrow). (b) The T2W image shows the right frontal lobe cortical malformation with polymicrogyria extending to involve the right frontal operculum (green arrows).

Differential diagnosis and mimics

There are few neurological syndromes affecting the orofacial control with preservation of reflexive orofacial movements. Etiologies that can cause this presentation include FCMS, catatonia, akinetic mutism, orobuccal apraxia, pseudobulbar palsy, bulbar palsy secondary to Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), myasthenia gravis (MG), and brainstem strokes.[2]

The preserved ability to follow commands to do activities with the limbs differentiates this from catatonia or akinetic mutism. Orobuccal apraxia could be a part of FCMS, but these patients are not usually mute nor are they unable to move the facial, lingual, and pharyngeal muscles.[2,3]

It could be challenging to differentiate pseudobulbar palsy from FCMS. Involuntary laughter and crying, which are a part of pseudobulbar palsy, are not seen with FCMS. Careful history and examination technique can help identify the inability to move the facial, buccal, lingual, and pharyngeal muscles, whereas pseudobulbar palsy causes partial bi-pyramidal syndromes with dysarthria as opposed to anarthria in FCMS.

To differentiate FCMS from bulbar palsy due to GBS, MG, or brainstem strokes, the history and preservation of automatic-voluntary dissociation in facial movements can be used. Other examination findings that could differentiate FCMS from bulbar palsy could be a lack of fasciculations, atrophy, and an absent jaw and gag reflex, which would be seen in bulbar palsy due to motor neuron disease or Kennedy’s disease.[3]

DISCUSSION

FCMS results from disruptions in the corticobulbar pathways that control voluntary orofacial movements. The most common cause is bilateral opercular damage due to etiologies including ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes, traumatic brain injury, infections (such as encephalitis or abscesses), congenital conditions such as perisylvian polymicrogyria or Worster– Drought syndrome, tumors, and demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis. These diverse causes highlight the need for careful evaluation of both acute and chronic structural lesions when assessing patients with orofacial motor deficits.

The hallmark clinical features of FCMS include profound loss of voluntary control over facial, lingual, and pharyngeal muscles, leading to anarthria and dysphagia. Reflexive and emotional movements, such as smiling or crying, remain intact because these actions are mediated by subcortical circuits, such as those involving the amygdala, hypothalamus, and striatum [Figure 3]. A unilateral lesion disrupting the corticobulbar pathways often produces only mild deficits due to the bilateral corticobulbar innervation of cranial motor nuclei.[4]

A schematic diagram representing the pathophysiology leading to “automatic (involuntary)-voluntary dissociation,” a characteristic clinical phenomenon seen in Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome.
Figure 3:
A schematic diagram representing the pathophysiology leading to “automatic (involuntary)-voluntary dissociation,” a characteristic clinical phenomenon seen in Foix–Chavany–Marie syndrome.

Although bilateral opercular damage is the most common cause, this case demonstrates how unilateral lesions (ischemic stroke - in this case), combined with pre-existing asymptomatic contralateral abnormalities (polymicrogyria - in this case), can produce similar symptoms.[5,6]

Early recognition of FCMS is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatments, particularly in distinguishing it from mimics such as pseudobulbar palsy, GBS, or MG. Misdiagnosis could lead to inappropriate use of immunosuppressive therapies, such as steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin. In this case, the preserved reflexive movements and imaging findings were critical in identifying the disconnection syndrome and steering the diagnostic process away from inflammatory or autoimmune etiologies.

Although the prognosis for FCMS remains poor, early diagnosis allows clinicians to implement targeted interventions, including secondary prevention if it is due to a stroke, nutritional support through feeding tubes, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of FCMS and the importance of recognizing rare presentations of disconnection syndromes. The combination of a left corona radiata infarction with contralateral opercular polymicrogyria causes a functional bilateral opercular syndrome.

Early and accurate identification of FCMS is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatments. This case highlights the role of detailed neurological examination and neuroimaging in identifying underlying structural lesions contributing to neurological dysfunction. The significance of dual-lesion mechanisms in rare neurological syndromes has been highlighted through our case, demonstrating how congenital abnormalities can become clinically relevant when compounded by an acute vascular event.

Although FCMS has been well-reported, increased awareness of FCMS among clinicians can aid in earlier recognition, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate rehabilitation strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Further research into rehabilitation approaches and functional recovery in FCMS is warranted to improve long-term prognoses.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Anterior opercular cortex lesions cause dissociated lower cranial nerve palsies and anarthria but no aphasia: Foix-Chavany-Marie syndrome and “automatic voluntary dissociation” revisited. J Neurol. 1993;240:199-208.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The Opercular-subopercular syndrome: Four cases with review of the literature. Behav Neurol. 1998;11:97-103.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Bilateral perisylvian softenings: Bilateral anterior opercular syndrome (FoixChavany-Marie syndrome) J Neurol. 1980;223:269-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Unilateral opercular infarction presenting with foix-chavany-marie syndrome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:179-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Opercular syndrome: Case reports and review of literature. Neurol Asia. 2010;15:145-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Bilateral corona radiata infarcts: A new topographic location of Foix-Chavany-Marie Syndrome. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:E39.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections