Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to the Editor
9 (
4
); 655-657
doi:
10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_118_18

Extracranial Vertebral Artery Aneurysm: An Unpleasant Consequence of Neck Massage

Department of Neurosurgery, National Neurosciences Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Department of Neurology, National Neurosciences Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Department of Radiology, Peerless Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. Prasad Krishnan, Department of Neurosurgery, National Neurosciences Centre, Peerless Hospital Campus, IInd Floor, 360 Panchasayar, Garia, Kolkata - 700 094, West Bengal, India. E-mail: prasad.krishnan@rediffmail.com
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

A 25-year-old right-handed gentleman with persistent occipital headache of 5 months’ duration noted a progressively enlarging and pulsatile swelling in the right side of the neck (behind the sternocleidomastoid muscle) for the past 4 months’ duration [Figure 1]. He had a history of getting a neck and head massage done by his barber periodically and usually clicking sounds would be felt by him during manipulation of the neck. Following the last such episode 6 months ago, he developed transient loss of consciousness on the barber's chair for about 15 min and after recovery complained of severe headache and ataxia for the next few days.

Figure 1
Lateral and posteroanterior clinical photographs of the patient showing a right-sided neck swelling in the posterior triangle

Computed tomography scans of the neck with contrast were done, which showed a large lobulated brilliantly contrast enhancing lesion (2.5 cm × 2.9 cm) in the right posterior triangle which was having a communication with the right vertebral artery (VA). The enhancing component was surrounded by a hypodense nonenhancing area (approximately 4 cm × 4 cm) with areas of differential density in them [Figure 2]. Three-dimensional reconstructions showed very small and indistinct vessels entering and exiting the sac. The aneurysm was located outside the spinal canal and posterior and lateral to the right C1–C2 joint. The distal right VA was small and indistinct compared to the opposite side (left) which was dominant and filling the basilar trunk [Figure 3].

Figure 2
(a) Axial, (b) coronal, and (c) sagittal images showing a brightly enhancing lesion in the right posterior triangle just lateral to the lateral masses of the vertebral bodies. The enhancing component is surrounded by a nonenhancing part that has layering seen inside it, while (d) is a coronal angiographic reconstruction showing the lesion attached to the vertebral artery by slender vessels
Figure 3
(a) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the aneurysm showing the origin from the vertebral artery is between the C1 and C2 foramen transversaria and behind the C1–C2 joint complex and (b) a three-dimensional reconstruction of all neck vessels with both vertebral arteries (blue stars) and the dominant left vertebral artery going on to form the basilar trunk (yellow circle)

The patient underwent unilateral right-sided exposure from C1 to C3 laminae and in an approach similar to exposing the C1–C2 joint, sacrifice of right C2 root was done, and the aneurysm sac was visualized. Soft tissue was mobilized around it and cauterization and disconnection of the VA proximal and distal to the aneurysm were done after which the sac was opened up, clots were removed, and piecemeal excision was done. “Liga” clips (Ethicon) were applied to the stumps of the vessels as a further precaution against postoperative bleeding. Thrombus was sent for histopathological examination. It was found to be laminated with alternate darker and lighter (lines of Zahn) layers composed of red blood cells and platelets and fibrin, respectively [Figure 4].

Figure 4
Laminated appearance of the aneurysmal thrombus on microscopy using hematoxylin and eosin stain showing alternate dark and pale lines composed of red blood cells (green stars) and fibrin and platelets (blue stars), respectively

The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was warned against getting neck manipulation done gain ever in his life as he now had only one patent VA.

Extracranial VA aneurysms are rare and usually occur following trauma.[12] They commonly occur as a result of dissection that may be caused by penetrating[12] and rarely blunt trauma.[1] Usually, the dissection takes place at the most mobile and unprotected segment of the VA – the atlantal segment (between transverse foramen of C2 and till it enters the dura).[3] The history our patient gave would suggest that initial passive forcible neck movements during massage led to a VA dissection from which he recovered and later presented with an expanding extracranial VA pseudoaneurysm resulting in C2 root compression and occipital neuralgia as well as the neck mass.

As with our patient, other reports too describe patients with a pulsatile cervical mass.[24] Modes of presentation may vary from cervical radiculopathy, ischemic strokes, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cranial neuropathies, and cerebellar features.[25]

Treatment modalities include excision of the aneurysm with ligation of the parent vessel,[125] excision with repair of the VA,[56] arterial bypass with trapping of the aneurysm and excision,[26] stenting the vessels,[5] embolization of the aneurysm[3] or parent vessel,[25] and flow diverters.[5] Of these, ligation of the VA is the most common procedure undertaken if the contralateral VA is patent.[1]

Ganesh Kumar et al.[7] showed that parent vessel sacrifice is an option yielding good outcome in a select group of aneurysms (predominantly vertebral dissecting aneurysms). As the aneurysm, in this case, had a very tenuous proximal inflow and distal outflow, direct repair post exclusion of the aneurysm was not an option. Embolization was ruled out as mass effect of the aneurysm had to be reduced, and bypass was not considered essential as the contralateral VA was filling the vertebrobasilar circulation well. Hence, we proceeded with parent artery occlusion and excision of the partially thrombosed aneurysm.

This case illustrates the need to be aware of the possibility of delayed presentation of a VA dissection in the form of a pulsatile neck mass and the need for a general awareness of the potentially catastrophic consequences sudden, violent neck movements might engender.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , . Large extracranial vertebral aneurysm with absent contralateral vertebral artery. Tex Heart Inst J. 2003;30:134-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Giant pseudoaneurysm of the extracranial vertebral artery: Case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1996;54:297-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Preferential location for arterial dissection presenting as golf-related stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:323-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Pseudoaneurysm of the extracranial vertebral artery; a case report. No Shinkei Geka. 1991;19:789-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Extracranial vertebral artery aneurysm presenting as a chronic cervical mass lesion. Case Rep Med 2010 2010 938219
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27:418-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Parent vessel occlusion for treatment of cerebral aneurysms: Is there still an indication? A series of 17 patients. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:250-5.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections