Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
Meta-Analysis
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
Meta-Analysis
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
Meta-Analysis
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_377_2025

Expanding spectrum of TORCH infections: A possible case of congenital Zika syndrome

Department of Pediatrics, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Neonatology, Super Speciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Neuroradiology, Super Speciality Hospital, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding author: Pawan Kumar Ghanghoriya, Department of Pediatrics, NSCB Medical College Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. docpawanvineeta06@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Ghanghoriya PK, Shah VK, Malviya L, Yadav N. Expanding spectrum of TORCH infections: A possible case of Congenital Zika syndrome. J Neurosci Rural Pract. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_377_2025

Abstract

Zika infection has been reported in many parts of India. Antenatal Zika virus infection can lead to congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), characterized by severe microcephaly, cortical malformations, subcortical calcifications, and ophthalmic abnormalities. The most common cause of microcephaly with intracranial calcification is toxoplasmosis, others (syphilis, HIV, parvovirus, and varicella), rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex, particularly congenital CMV infection (cCMV). It is difficult to differentiate CZS from cCMV. The Fetal brain disruption sequence (FBDS), posterior fossa malformations, calcifications in subcortical, basal ganglia, and brainstem, retinal scar and retinal pigmentary mottling, and arthrogryposis are important pointers favoring CZS. We are presenting a case of severe congenital microcephaly, intracranial calcifications, FBDS, lissencephaly, and retinal scar, most probably CZS, as other etiologies were excluded from the study. Although the Zika polymerase chain reaction was negative, Zika serology could not be done.

Keywords

Congenital Zika syndrome
Intracranial calcification
Microcephaly
Scalloped skull sign
Toxoplasmosis
others (syphilis
HIV
parvovirus
and varicella)
rubella
cytomegalovirus
herpes simplex

INTRODUCTION

Intrauterine infections are the common cause of microcephaly with intracranial calcifications. Among these, congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common etiology. Non-infectious causes such as Aicardi–Goutières syndrome (AGS), and genetic heterogeneous group of pseudo-toxoplasmosis, others (syphilis, HIV, parvovirus, and varicella), rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex (TORCH) syndrome band-like calcification with simplified gyration and polymicrogyria (BLCPMG), are mimickers of TORCH infections. Reports of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) in Brazil after the Zika epidemic in 2015 added one new etiology in the TORCH group of infections. The Zika outbreak in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, and sporadic cases in other states of India, raised concerns for CZS in India.[1,2] CZS is diagnosed by characteristic clinical findings, neuroimaging, and laboratory tests (Nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT] and immunoglobulin M [IgM] antibodies testing in infant serum, and NAAT on infant urine).[3] Here, we are presenting a probable case of CZS.

CASE REPORT

A 3-day-old baby presented with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The baby had severe microcephaly (occipitofrontal circumference [OFC] 2 9 cm, <−3 standard deviation (SD) on the World Health Organization growth chart), collapsed skull, low sloping forehead, disproportionately large face, overlapping of sutures, and small anterior fontanelle [Figure 1a]. There was no dysmorphism, organomegaly, cataract, contractures, midline, and other malformation. Parents belong to central India. There was no history of febrile illness, rash, drug, or alcohol intake during the antenatal period. There was no bad obstetrics history and no family history of neurological disorders. The antenatal HIV test was negative. This was a full-term, normal vaginal delivery with a birth weight of 2400 g.

(a) Cranial-facial disproportion with small head size. (b) Chorioretinal atrophic patch (arrow), retinal pigmentary mottling (star), and tortuous vessels (arrowhead). (c) T1 sagittal sequence showing pontocerebellar hypoplasia (star) and scalloped skull sign (arrow). (d) T2 sequence thick smooth cortex suggestive of lissencephaly (arrow) and widened cerebrospinal fluid spaces (star), (e) T2 sequence showing cerebellar hypoplasia (arrow), (f) Computed tomography head showing calcifications in the basal ganglia and thalamus (arrows).
Figure 1:
(a) Cranial-facial disproportion with small head size. (b) Chorioretinal atrophic patch (arrow), retinal pigmentary mottling (star), and tortuous vessels (arrowhead). (c) T1 sagittal sequence showing pontocerebellar hypoplasia (star) and scalloped skull sign (arrow). (d) T2 sequence thick smooth cortex suggestive of lissencephaly (arrow) and widened cerebrospinal fluid spaces (star), (e) T2 sequence showing cerebellar hypoplasia (arrow), (f) Computed tomography head showing calcifications in the basal ganglia and thalamus (arrows).

Based on severe congenital disproportionate microcephaly, low birth weight, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, intrauterine infections (TORCH) were considered. Other differentials were genetic causes of non-syndromic microcephaly (autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, and X-linked), AGS, and BLCPMG mutation.

Routine investigations, echocardiogram, ultrasonography of the abdomen, and brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) were normal. Total serum bilirubin was 16 mg/dL (indirect 15.6mg/dL). Ophthalmic examination reported retinal scars and retinal pigmentation [Figure 1b]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain on the 7th postnatal day (PND) showed lissencephaly, ponto cerebellar hypoplasia, and scalloped skull sign [Figure 1c-e]. Computed tomography head on 9th PND showed basal ganglia and thalamic calcification [Figure 1f]. Urinary CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and TORCH serology were negative. TORCH serology of the mother was also negative. Zika virus PCR was negative in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the baby and the serum of the mother. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was normal. Zika serology could not be done.

CZS was considered due to the endemicity of the Zika virus, classical collapsed skull sign, compatible MRI and retinal findings, as well as exclusion of other causes. Parents were counselled about high risk for cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and epilepsy. Early interventions were started in the neonatal period itself. At 1 month of age, the baby had spasticity in all four limbs, and by 3 months of age, spasticity progressed despite physiotherapy and Baclofen, and there was an absence of neck holding and social smile.

DISCUSSION

Microcephaly is defined as OFC <−2 SD and severe microcephaly as OFC <−3 SD. Microcephaly may be congenital (identified at birth) or postnatal (developed later on). It may be proportionate when the growth of the whole body is equally affected, such as Seckel syndrome, or disproportionate, where the brain growth is primarily affected. If the baby has severe congenital microcephaly without other major brain or somatic malformations, it is termed primary microcephaly.[4] Our case had severe congenital disproportionate microcephaly. Based on clinical and neuroimaging findings, our differential restricted to CZS, cCMV, AGS, and BLCPMG. AGS and BLCPMG were ruled out by genetic testing.

Intrauterine Zika virus infections cause direct neurological injury and severe loss of brain volume leads to FBDS. The FBDS phenotype is characterized by severe microcephaly, overlapping cranial sutures, prominent occipital bone, redundant scalp skin, and facial disproportion. It is postulated to arise from partial brain destruction leading to a fall in intracranial pressure and subsequent skull collapse. The most common cause is intrauterine infections. It is common in CZS, although not specific.[5,6]

Neuroimaging findings include brain anomalies, cerebral cortex thinning, cerebral volume loss, increased fluid spaces, abnormal gyral patterns such as lissencephaly and polymicrogyria, calcifications in subcortical, basal ganglia, and thalamic regions, corpus callosum anomalies, reduced white matter, and cerebellar hypoplasia.[7]

Ophthalmic finding includes macular scarring, focal pigmentary retinal mottling, chorioretinal atrophy, or optic nerve hypoplasia/atrophy; structural anomalies (microphthalmia, coloboma, cataracts, and posterior anomalies). Congenital contractures involving one or multiple joints such as club foot or arthrogryposis has been reported in CZS. These babies usually have pronounced early hypertonia/spasticity with extrapyramidal symptoms, motor disabilities, cognitive disabilities, irritability/excessive crying, tremors, swallowing dysfunction, hearing impairment, and epilepsy.[5,7]

Zika virus infection is usually asymptomatic (about 80%), but manifests as acute flu-like illness with rash, conjunctivitis, and fever. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that for suspected CZS, NAAT and IgM testing should be performed on infant serum and CSF, and NAAT on infant urine.[8] NAAT is usually positive transiently in acute infection (within 2 weeks), so a negative test does not rule out Zika infection.[9] IgM antibodies will also be negative if done after a few weeks, as antibodies wane with time. IgM antibody tests for dengue virus, West Nile fever, and Zika virus share considerable epitope cross-reactivity, leading to false positivity. If the IgM is positive, it should be confirmed by the plaque reduction neutralization test.

Neuroimaging in CZS closely resembles that of cCMV. The most prominent difference is the distribution of intracranial calcifications, which are typically subcortical, basal ganglia, thalamic, and brainstem in CZS, while periventricular and cortical in cCMV.[10] Differences in cCMV and CZS are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.

Supplementary Table 1

Although in our case, it was difficult to differentiate between cCMV and CZS based on neuroimaging findings alone, FBDS, isolated CNS involvement, posterior fossa malformations, negative urine CMV PCR, negative TORCH serology in baby and mother, normal BERA, retinal scar, early development of spasticity, and epidemiological correlation helped us conclude CZS as the probable diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The spectrum of infectious and genetic causes of intracranial infections is expanding, and all the possibilities should be kept in mind. The Zika virus is an important differential for babies with microcephaly and intracranial calcifications. FBDS, posterior fossa malformation, calcifications in the subcortical, basal ganglia, and brainstem, retinal scar, and retinal pigmentary mottling can differentiate CZS from cCMV. Availability of serological test for Zika virus infection will help in early identification and prevention of Zika spread in the community.

Strength our case report is that we excluded all possible causes of congenital microcephaly and intracranial calcification, and epidemiological correlation was used as supportive evidence.

A limitation of our study is that we could not prove our diagnosis by a serological test.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient--has given consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understand that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , . The expanding arms of Zika virus: An updated review with recent Indian outbreaks. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31:1-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Serious concern of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) in India: A narrative review. J Pregnancy. 2024;2024:1758662.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Update: Interim Guidance for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection-United States, October 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:1089-99.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Infectious causes of microcephaly: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:e1-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Congenital Zika syndrome: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0242367.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Fetal brain disruption sequence. J Pediatr. 1990;116:383-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:288-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Infant with Congenital Zika Virus Infection. . Atlanta (GA): CDC; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/hcp/diagnosis-testing/index.html#cdc_generic_section_8-infant-with-possible-congenital-zika-virus-infection [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 14]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . Zika virus congenital syndrome, the new Z in TORCHZ? Prospects for diagnosis prevention and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29:94-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Congenital brain abnormalities and Zika virus: What the radiologist can expect to see prenatally and postnatally. Radiology. 2016;281:203-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections