Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
16 (
3
); 391-397
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_434_2024

Epilepsy-related direct medical cost in adult patients living with epilepsy

Laboratory of Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical Research and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry of Fez, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Laboratory of Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry of Fez, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.

*Corresponding author: Nabil Tachfouti, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry of Fez, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco. nabil.tachfouti@usmba.ac.ma

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Zoulou O, El Fakir S, Omari M, Souirti Z, Tachfouti N. Epilepsy-related direct medical cost in adult patients living with epilepsy. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2025:16:391-97. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_434_2024

Abstract

Objectives:

Epilepsy carries an important economic burden worldwide. It is a disease underfunded and inadequately treated in Morocco. However, its economic cost is not well explored. The objective of this study is to estimate the direct medical cost (DMC) of epilepsy management in Morocco.

Materials and Methods:

A cost-of-illness study was conducted between 2021 and 2022, among patients with epilepsy at the outpatient neurology unit of Fez University Hospital, Morocco. Data were collected using a face-to-face anonymous questionnaire including sociodemographic data, epilepsy characteristics, and healthcare resource utilization: days in hospital, medical visits, tests performed, surgery, and drugs. The bottom-up approach was used to estimate costs by multiplying the use of resources in terms of number by the official prices published by the National Agency for Health Insurance. The analysis adopted a societal perspective over a 12 months’ time horizon.

Results:

A total of 110 patients were included, with a mean age of 35.7 ± 12.2 years. The median DMC of managing epilepsy was US$ 425.1 (259.8–777.2). Medication was the most important component accounting for 56.2%, followed by radiological explorations and hospitalization, which accounted for 20.8% and 15.3%, respectively. Surgery was the least costly, contributing only 1.4% to the total DMCs. DMC was significantly higher in patients who reported frequent seizures during the month before the survey (P = 0.003), those who had experienced a seizure within the past 4 weeks (P = 0.005), individuals with critical crisis-related trauma (P = 0.036), patients with comorbid conditions such as psychogenic crises (P = 0.038), patients on polytherapy (P < 0.001), those who had undergone surgery (P = 0.027), radiological explorations (P < 0.001), and patients who had been hospitalized (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

As the first economic study of epilepsy in Morocco, this analysis could assist in the healthcare allocation of scarce resources and pharmacoeconomic analysis of antiepileptic drugs.

Keywords

Cost of epilepsy
Direct medical cost
Epilepsy
Morocco

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a brain disorder characterized by irregular electrical action causing seizures or abnormal behavior and sometimes loss of consciousness.[1] The International League Against Epilepsy published a revised classification of epilepsy syndromes in 2022. Epilepsy syndromes are divided into syndromes with onset in neonates and infants (up to 2 years of age), syndromes with a variable onset age, syndromes with onset in childhood, and idiopathic generalized epilepsies.[2]

Supplementary File

Epilepsy is the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally. There are approximately 70 million patients with epilepsy (PwE) worldwide,[3] and 2.4 million new cases are diagnosed annually.[4] Around 80% of PwE reside in low- to middle-income countries.[5] Although the burden of the disease reduced from 1990 to 2016, epilepsy remains a significant cause of disability and mortality.[6] Epilepsy was included as one of the 30 most common causes of invalidity between 1990 and 2016.[7] In comparison with high-income nations, low- and middle-income countries have reported an active prevalence rate of more than 10 cases per 1,000 people.[8]

Epilepsy has a significant economic impact, medical expenditure panel survey data estimated average annual direct cost as US$ 2,515 in Texas.[9] Other studies have shown variability drivers of treatment costs such as time elapsed since diagnosis, antiepileptic drug (AED) effectiveness, disease severity, and health insurance coverage.[10,11] Economic analysis in a direct aspect is an indispensable tool for different diseases, in particular epilepsy, which aims at producing preventive means and efficient therapeutic strategies,[12] and also allows to provide references for the concerned state authorities to adapt the different actions to their needs.

In Morocco, according to the 2018 National Health Accounts, total health expenditures per capita reached 184 US dollars and 489 dollars in terms of purchasing power parity $.[13,14] In Morocco, the Mandatory Health Insurance covers employees, civilian servants, and self-employed individuals. The system is administered by the National Social Security Fund for the private sector and by the National Fund for Social Security Organizations for the public sector. Meanwhile, the Medical Assistance Scheme (RAMED) program provides health coverage for the most poor and vulnerable populations, ensuring access to essential healthcare services.[15]

A population-based study carried out in 2022 estimated the lifetime and active epilepsy prevalence rates to be 19.8 (15– 24.6) and 17.6 (13.3–22.8) per 1,000, respectively.[16] However, epilepsy has not been considered a public health priority in Morocco. Its treatment encounters the low priority accorded to it by the health authorities.

Furthermore, no original data on its management are available. The purpose of this research is to estimate the direct medical cost (DMC) of managing epilepsy in Morocco.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and population

We conducted a cost of illness study among PwE presenting at the outpatient department of Fez University Hospital from May 1st, 2021, to June 31st, 2022. The study included both new and old cases of all types of epilepsy. PwE were included when they were aged 18 years or older; they attended follow-up consultations during the past 12 months; and, they had no intellectual disabilities responsible for communication difficulties. A prevalence-based approach was employed to determine the DMC. This approach estimates costs occurring concurrently with overall prevalent cases over a specified period, generally a year. The prevalence-based method is useful when the study aims to draw attention of the health policy planners or decision-makers to burden conditions.[17]

Data collection

Data were collected by trained interviewers using face-to-face anonymous questionnaires and supplemented from the electronic records incorporated into the hospital information system. The questionnaire included items on (1) sociodemographic data (age, sex, professional activity, educational level, health insurance, and income), (2) epilepsy characteristics (historic, type, age of onset, comorbidities, seizure frequency, and trigger factors), and (3) healthcare resource utilization during the past 12 months including:

  • Hospitalizations in different departments: Neurology, intensive care units, neurosurgery, and sleep unit;

  • Consultations (neurology and emergency);

  • Radiological assessments: Electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), EEG-video, and computed tomography (CT) scan;

  • Biological assessments including hemogram, ionogram, trans-aminase, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D, phosphorus, and calcium;

  • Treatments: Medical treatment comprising medicines used by each patient, specifying their commercial names, dosages, and duration of medication, as well as surgery.

Cost estimation

Costs were estimated using the “bottom-up micro-costing” approach.[18] Costs of medication, hospital stay, and medical acts were obtained from a reimbursable drugs guide developed by the National Agency of Health Insurance and Hospital Admissions and Billing Office.[19,20] Costs were calculated by multiplying the use of resources (health services) by the official unit prices. All costs were initially calculated in Moroccan dirhams (MAD) and then converted to US dollars at an exchange rate of 1 US$ = 10.43 MAD, as of December 31, 2022.[21]

Research time horizon and perspective

In line with recommendations for cost-of-illness studies, a prevalence-based method was used to estimate annual healthcare resource costs. The analysis adopted a societal perspective. Costs were not discounted because the time horizon did not exceed 12 months.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented using mean, standard deviations, median, interquartile range (IQR), and frequency (percentages) as appropriate. The normality of the DMC of epilepsy was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test since we had a sample size >50. The association between DMC and various variables was realized by non-parametric tests since the distribution does not follow a normal distribution (to compare several distributions, the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied; and for comparisons of two distributions, the Mann–Whitney U test was used). Data analysis was done using SPSS version 26. The level of significance was set at a P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic and epilepsy characteristics of participants

110 PwE were included, with a mean age of 35.7 ± 12.2 years, more than half (53.6%) were women, and two tiers (66.4%) had no professional activity. Monthly income was <2000 MAD (<US$191.7) for 93.6% and more than three quarts (78.2%) were enrolled in the RAMED program. The average duration since the initial onset of epilepsy symptoms was 19.4 ± 10.7 years. One-half (50.0 %) of participants had generalized epilepsy while 56.4% reported seizures in the past month, 26.4% of patients were diagnosed to have comorbid conditions, and more than half (56.4%) were on more than one anti-seizure medication. More than three quarts (86.4%) had <10 seizures during the month preceding the survey. Sociodemographic and epilepsy characteristics are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of patients (n=110).
Demographic characteristics Proportion (%)
Age (Years) Mean±SD 35.7±12.2
Sex
  Male (n=51) 46.4
  Female 53.6
Marital status
  Married 35.5
  Unmarried 64.5
Employment status
  Employed 33.6
  Unemployed 66.4
Educational level
  Iterate 18.2
  Primary school 33.6
  College 14.5
  High school 21.8
  University 11.8
Monthly income
  <191.7 93.6
  191.7–479.3 2.7
  >479.3 3.6
Insurance
  RAMED 78.2
  CNOPS 14.5
  CNSS 7.3

RAMED: Medical assistance scheme, CNOPS: National Fund for Social Security Organizations, CNSS: The National Social Security Fund. SD : Standard deviation

Table 2: Medical characteristics of patients (n=110).
Clinical characteristics Proportion (%)
Age of onset (years) Mean±SD 16.2±12.5
Duration of epilepsy (years) Mean±SD 19.4±10.7
Type of epilepsy
  Generalized 50
  Partial 48.2
Treatment
  Monotherapy 42.7
  Polytherapy 56.4
Trauma
  No 50
  Yes 50
Number of seizures in the past month
  <10 86.4
  ≥10 13.6
Seizure in the past 4 weeks
  Absent 43.6
  Present 56.4
Comorbidities
  Psychogenic crisis
    No 96.4
    Yes 3.6
  Sleep disorders
    No 82.7
    Yes 17.3
  Depression
    No 73.6
    Yes 26.4
  Memory disorders
    No 94.5
    Yes 5.5
Seizure trigger factors
  Sick
    No 80
    Yes 20
  Lack of sleep
    No 60
    Yes 40
  Stress
    No 85.5
    Yes 14.5
  Forget of AEDs
    No 64.5
    Yes 35.5
  Problems
    No 81.8
    Yes 18.2

AEDs: Antiepileptic drugs, SD: Standard deviation.

Utilization of healthcare resources

During their follow-up, participants attended an average of 2.4 ± 1.2 consultations. More than half of them (53.6%) received an EEG, 29.1% had an MRI, 13.6 % had an EEG-Video, 7.3% had a CT, and 20.9% had biological tests in the past year for epilepsy-related diagnostic testing. Of these patients, 2.7 % underwent surgery as shown in Table 3. Among six patients (5.5%) were admitted to the neurology department, 2.7% to the neurosurgery department, 5.5% to the intensive care unit, and 13.6% to the sleep unit [Table 3].

Table 3: Health care utilization.
nor mean±SD Proportion (%)
Consultations 2.4±1.2
Radiological explorations
  EEG 59 53.6
  EEG-Video 15 13.6
  MRI 32 29.1
  CT 8 7.3
  Biological tests 23 20.9
Hospitalization
  Neurology 6 5.5
  Neurosurgery 3 2.7
  Intensive care 6 5.5
  Sleep unit 15 13.6
  Surgery 3 2.7

EEG: Electroencephalogram, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, CT: Computed tomography, SD: Standard deviation.

DMC of epilepsy and associated factors

The median DMC for managing epilepsy in Morocco was US$ 425.1 (mean of US$ 566.6). More than half of it (56.2%) US$ 260.7 (154.3–412.2) corresponded to medication costs. Radiological explorations accounted for almost 20% of the costs US$ 28.7 (0–220.5), followed by hospitalization which constitutes 15.3% of the DMC, consultations (4.7%) US$ 23.01 (23.01–34.5), and biological tests (1.6%). The rest (1.4%) were costs related to surgery, which were the least expensive component, as shown in Table 4 and Figure 1.

Table 4: Details of the direct medical cost of epilepsy.
Median in USD (IQR) Percentage
Radiological explorations 28.7 (0–220.5) 20.8
Biological tests 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 1.6
Consultations 23.01 (23.01–34.5) 4.7
Hospitalization 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 15.3
Medications 260.7 (154.3–412.2) 56.2
Surgery 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 1.4
Total direct medical cost 425.1 (259.8–777.2) 100

IQR: Interquartile range.

Average direct medical cost of epilepsy according to its components.
Figure 1:
Average direct medical cost of epilepsy according to its components.

DMCs were significantly higher among patients who reported frequent seizures during the month before the survey (US$ Median [IQR]) US$ 839.8 (426.5–1111.2) versus 395.7 (249.3–689.8) (P = 0.003), those who had a seizure in the past 4 weeks 505.0 (309.2–849.5) versus 348.7 (215.7–503.4) (P = 0.005), individuals with critical crisis-related trauma US$ 501.05 (299.7–831.1) versus 362.1 (240.9–611.6) (P = 0.036), patients with comorbidities such as psychogenic crises 868.5 (576.3–1225.8) versus 420.5 (255.3–759.4) (P = 0.038), those on polytherapy US$ 625.6 (336.7–879.4) (P < 0.001), patients who had undergone surgery US$ 1441.7 (589.05–1441.7) (P = 0.027), radiological explorations US$ 495.4 (337.9–841.1) (P < 0.001), and individuals who had been hospitalized US$ 899.8 (827.9–1310.03) (P < 0.001). These findings are detailed in Table 5.

Table 5: Factors associated with direct medical cost of epilepsy.
Factors Median in USD (IQR) P-value
Treatment
  Monotherapy 333.6 (201.4–436.04) 0.000***
  Polytherapy 625.6 (336.7– 879.4)
Number of seizures in the past month
  <10 395.7 (249.3–689.8) 0.003**
  ≥10 839.8 (426.5–1111.2)
Seizure in the past 4 weeks
  Absent 348.7 (215.7–503.4) 0.005**
  Present 505.0 (309.2–849.5)
Trauma
  No 362.1 (240.9–611.6) 0.036*
  Yes 501.05 (299.7–831.1)
Comorbidities
  Psychogenic crisis
    No 420.5 (255.3–759.4) 0.038*
    Yes 868.5 (576.3–1225.8)
  Hospitalization
    No 348.7 (229.06–501.5) 0.000***
    Yes 899.8 (827.9–1310.03)
  Surgery
    No 423.4 (255.8–767.2) 0.027*
    Yes 1441.7 (589.05–1441.7)
  Radiological explorations
    No 281.4 (193.0–497.6) 0.000***
    Yes 495.4 (337.9–841.1)
Significant with P<0.001; **Significant with P≤0.01; *Significant with P≤0.05, IQR: Interquartile range.

DISCUSSION

This research is the first to assess the DMC of epilepsy in Morocco. The median DMC of epilepsy management was US$ 425.1 (mean of US$ 566.6) per patient per year. Our results are similar to those of a study carried out in Rwanda (DMC = US$ 248.9).[22] However, our findings are higher compared to Northwest Ethiopia (US$ 37 ± 27.3)[23] and Bhutan (US$ 91).[24] Conversely, data from Nigeria (DMC = US$ 3,947.2),[25] Moscow Russia 955€ (IQR 521–2134; range 51–10,904),[26] and Spain (1055.2€)[27] reported that cost of epilepsy management is higher than our results (US$ 425.1). A study conducted in Poland reported that direct costs of epilepsy increased over time, ranging from 84 mln € in 2014 to approximately 88 mln € in 2016 for patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2016.[28]

The observed differences between countries may result from variations in patient management protocols (including medications, treatment procedures, and medical technologies) and cost estimation methodologies (inclusion and exclusion criteria of patients, sampling size, and statistical analysis).[11] In addition, these differences may also be attributed to the fact that we based on a prevalence approach and that the majority of the tests were completed in the 1st year of diagnosis for all subjects, who had all previously received an epilepsy diagnosis. The study period corresponded with the COVID-19 pandemic, and there was a low rate of healthcare utilization.

This study showed that a considerable portion of the DMC for epilepsy management was attributed to medications (56.2%), followed by radiological explorations (20.8%) and hospitalization (15.3%). Similar findings were observed in studies from Rwanda[22] and Nigeria[25] where AEDs accounted for a substantial portion of the average individual cost of epilepsy management, representing 65% and 81.3% of the total annual DMCs, respectively.

A German study reported an annual direct cost of 1698€ for epilepsy treatment, with the majority of expenses attributed to AEDs (59.9%) and hospitalization (30%).[29] Similarly, research from China found that the largest portions of the overall expenditure were allocated to medications (US$394.53) and diagnostic procedures (US$59.34).[30] A comparable result was observed in Northwest Ethiopia, where AEDs (US$21.5) and investigations (US$12.4) accounted for the largest share of costs,[23] emphasizing the significant financial burden associated with medicines and diagnostic interventions. These studies highlighted that patients on polytherapy incurred higher treatment costs than those on monotherapy, likely due to the elevated cost of AEDs.

Psychiatric comorbidities are among the most common comorbidities of epilepsy.[6,31] In this present study, we measured the association between DMC and the presence of comorbidities. The findings revealed a significant association between psychogenic seizure and the total DMC (P = 0.038).

Both the occurrence and the number of seizures were associated with the DMC of epilepsy in this study (P = 0.005) and (P = 0.003), respectively. This finding aligns with results obtained in China[30] and Bhutan.[24] This similarity may be due to the fact that frequent seizures require additional treatment and care.

Surgery was associated with DMCs in this analysis (P = 0.027). A significant French study demonstrated the role of surgery on a clinical, medicoeconomic, or quality of life level in the treatment of drug-resistant partial epilepsies in adults. After 5 years of surgery, the DMCs for these patients dropped from 4110 euros at the time of inclusion to 1233 euros.[32] To limit cognitive decline and psychological and social disability, surgery should not be the last resort treatment option.

The cost determined in this study corresponds to 0.16 times the per capita gross domestic product (GDP), which was valued at 36274 MAD (US$ 3477.8) in 2022 based on (High Commission for Planning).[33] The fact that about 12.7% of Moroccans are poor and 7.3% are vulnerable according to data for the year 2020[34] shows that patients are unable to cover the expenses associated with epilepsy treatment and had to adopt negative coping strategies like relying on family or social networks for assistance. Our results show that 78.2% of patients in our target population are covered by RAMED, reflecting the national coverage levels in Morocco.[20]

This study had several limitations. First, the retrospective collection of patient data may have led to information bias and an underestimation of costs. Second, the research was conducted in a public hospital and did not include PwE followed in private sectors who may differ from our population on sociodemographic characteristics and health expenditure. Finally, we did not estimate direct non-medical and indirect costs, which would give an idea of the overall cost of epilepsy.

Despite these limitations, our method was developed based on international standards of disease burden estimation. Our study provides the first available cost data for epilepsy treatment in Morocco.

Kissani et al. highlighted the difficulties in the treatment and managing epilepsy and the limitations of available AEDs.[35] The healthcare budget is limited, with resources primarily allocated to other diseases. Another potential factor for undermedication is the ignorance of treatment options for epilepsy, as a result of lack of education and awareness. Our findings are useful for policymakers, and they suggest more resource allocation for epilepsy management to improve accessibility to AEDs comprising generics. Other actions need to be implemented to promote preventive strategies for conditions that contribute to epilepsy, including perinatal events and febrile convulsions.

In terms of research, our data may provide a useful basis for pharmacoeconomic evaluations (cost-effectiveness modelization) of anti-epilepsy interventions.

CONCLUSION

This analysis could assist in the healthcare allocation of scarce resources and pharmaco-economic analysis of anti-epileptic drugs.

Acknowledgments:

We would like to express our gratitude to the study subjects who voluntarily agreed to participate in the interviews and the study.

Authors’ contributions:

OZ: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. SEF: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Project administration, Methodology. OM: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software. ZS: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. NT: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Ethical approval:

The research/study complied with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , . Seminar in epileptology the natural history and prognosis of epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2015;17:243-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The 2022 international league against epilepsy classification and definition of childhood epilepsy syndromes: An update for pediatricians. Indian Pediatr. 2024;61:179-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Seminar epilepsy in adults. Lancet. 2019;393:689-701.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Epidemiology of epilepsy in Lubumbashi, democratic republic of Congo. Neurol Res Int. 2020;2020:5621461.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . Epilepsy consulté 10 octobre 2023 à l'adresse; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy [Last accessed on 2023 Oct 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:357-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211-1259.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. Neurology. 2016;88:296-303.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Direct and indirect cost of epilepsy: Latest estimates from the medical expenditure panel survey Texas: The University of Texas School of Public Health; .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . A comprehensive review of the literature on epilepsy in selected countries in emerging markets. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:585-97.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. The economic impact of epilepsy: A systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:245.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Epilepsy in India II: Impact, burden, and need for a multisectoral public health response. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2015;18:369-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. . “National Health Accounts (NHA),”. . Available from: https://www.sante.gov.ma/Publications/Etudes_enquete/Documents/2021/CNS-2018.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 26]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . “Health in Figures,”. 2021 Available from: https://www.sante.gov.ma/Documents/2024/04/Sante%20en%20chiffre%202021%20VF%20(2).pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . Promulgation de la loi n 65-00 portant code de la couverture Loi n 65-00 portant code de la couverture médicale de base. . 2002;1423:1-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of epilepsy in Morocco: A population-based study. Epilepsia Open. 2023;8:1340-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. . Cost-of-illness analysis. What room in health economics? Health Policy. 2006;77:51-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. “costing of health services for provider payment”. . Available from: https://www.jointlearningnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/JLN_Costing_Manual.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ANAM- guide des médicaments. Available from: https://eservices.anam.ma [Last accessed on 2023 Jul 26]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ANAM. Maladie agence nationale de l'assurance. Available from: https://anam.ma/anam/regulation/tarification-nationalede-reference [Last accessed on 2023 Nov 15]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. . Historique dollar américain dirham marocain (USD MAD) décembre. . Available from: https://devises.zone/historique/dollar-us/dirham-marocain/decembre-2022 [Last accessed from: 2024 May 13]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Epilepsy-related direct medical and direct non-medical cost in adult patients living with epilepsy at a tertiary neurology center in Rwanda. Clin Econ Outcomes Res. 2022;15:15-27.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Cost of illness of epilepsy and associated factors in patients attending adult outpatient department of university of Gondar referral hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:2385-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. The economic burden of epilepsy in Bhutan. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23:342-58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Estimated direct cost of treating epilepsy per month in Southeast Nigeria. Intern J Neurol. 2010;13:1-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . The direct costs of epilepsy in Russia. A prospective cost-of-illness study from a single center in Moscow. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64:122-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . Analysis of direct, indirect, and intangible costs of epilepsy. Neurología. 2011;26:32-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . “The direct and indirect costs of epilepsy in Poland estimates for 2014-2016 years.,”. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019;0(0):1.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Evaluation of costs of epilepsy using an electronic practice management software in Germany. Seizure. 2015;26:49-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Burden of epilepsy: A prevalence-based cost of illness study of direct, indirect and intangible costs for epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2015;110:146-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. The burden of epilepsy and unmet need in people with focal seizures. Brain Behav. 2022;12:e2589.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Évaluation médicoéconomique de la chirurgie des épilepsies partielles pharmacorésistantes de l'adulte: Résultats à trois ans d'une étude prospective multicentrique francaise Medicoeconomic assessment of epilepsy surgery in adults with medically intr. Neurochirurgie. 2008;54:484-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. . PIB par habitant - morocco. Available from: https://www.hcp.ma/pib-par-habitant-endirham-a3126.html [Last accessed on: 2023 Jul 20]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. . High-commission for planning. Available from: https://www.hcp.ma/pauvrete-vulnerabilite-r493.html [Last accessed on 2023 Dec 01]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Epilepsy in morocco: Realities, pitfalls and prospects. Epilepsia Open. 2021;6:13-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections