Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
16 (
3
); 467-469
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_31_2025

Dengue-associated invasive central nervous system aspergillosis in an immunocompetent host

Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

*Corresponding author: Ayush Agarwal, Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. ayushthetaurian@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mittal S, Mustafa F, Agarwal A, Garg D, Garg A, Angitha KP, et al. Dengue-associated invasive central nervous system aspergillosis in an immunocompetent host. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2025:16:467-9. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_31_2025

Abstract

Dengue-associated isolated fungal infections of the brain parenchyma are rarely reported. An invasive fungal infection can occur secondary to the inflammatory milieu created by the dengue virus infection. We present a case of invasive central nervous system aspergillosis in an immunocompetent host with a recent dengue infection.

Keywords

ADEM
Aspergillus
Dengue

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections have been well described in immunodeficient individuals. Recently, published reports have described fungal infections following dengue infection.[1] We present a case of dengue-associated Aspergillus brain abscesses in a previously immunocompetent host.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old woman presented with high-grade fever accompanied by chills, rigors, and headache to a local hospital on the 3rd day of illness. She was found to have thrombocytopenia and tested positive for dengue NS1 antigen. She responded to parenteral antipyretic agents but developed acute-onset hemiparesis on day 7 of her illness.

Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) brain revealed a right fronto-parietal hypodensity, while computed tomography angiogram of the head-and-neck vessels was unremarkable. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) brain revealed a T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery heterogeneously hyperintense lesion in the bilateral centrum semiovale (right >left) with foci of diffusion restriction, microhemorrhages, and patchy contrast enhancement [Figure 1]. Her cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed 8 cells (L100), protein 51 mg/dL, and glucose 69 mg/dL. She was diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g once daily. However, after 3 days of therapy, her sensorium worsened, and she was referred to our center.

She was comatose upon admission (Glasgow Coma Scale: E4V1M2), had spasticity of all limbs (left > right), bilateral extensor plantars with neck rigidity. She was intubated and a repeat CE-MRI (6 days after her first) revealed a significant increase in lesion size with mass-effect with microhemorrhages [Figure 2]. She had lymphopenia (minimum count - 608/mL) with raised triglyceride and ferritin levels, suggestive of cytokine storm. CSF showed 15 cells (L100), protein 65 mg/dL, and sugar 76 mg/dL (corresponding blood sugar: 118 mg/dL). CSF Gram’s stain, bacterial culture, India ink, cryptococcal antigen, ZN staining, GeneXpert, VDRL, panviral polymerase chain reaction (PCR), malignant cytology, wet mount for parasites, and fungal culture were negative [Supplementary Table 1]. An atypical neuro-infection was considered (parasitic, fungal, or atypical bacterial), and she was started on a cocktail of liposomal amphotericin B, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, meropenem, and azithromycin. She tested positive for both serum (0.8, normal value <0.5) and CSF galactomannan (4.674, normal value <0.5), but her fungal culture was negative.

Supplementary Table 1
(a) Axial T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) shows ill-defined iso-to hypointense lesions in the bilateral centrum semiovale, with more pronounced involvement on the right side (arrow). (b) On T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI), the lesions appear heterogeneously hyperintense (arrows). (c) Diffusion-weighted imaging reveals areas of diffusion restriction (arrows) within the lesions. (d) Coronal T2-WI demonstrates lesion extension into the subcortical, deep, and periventricular white matter, along with a central cavity (arrow). (e) Axial susceptibility-weighted angiography shows multiple susceptibility foci, including some arranged around the central cavity (arrow). (f) Contrast-enhanced T1-WI highlights patchy, heterogeneous enhancement (arrows), with prominent enhancement of the central cavity wall.
Figure 1:
(a) Axial T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) shows ill-defined iso-to hypointense lesions in the bilateral centrum semiovale, with more pronounced involvement on the right side (arrow). (b) On T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI), the lesions appear heterogeneously hyperintense (arrows). (c) Diffusion-weighted imaging reveals areas of diffusion restriction (arrows) within the lesions. (d) Coronal T2-WI demonstrates lesion extension into the subcortical, deep, and periventricular white matter, along with a central cavity (arrow). (e) Axial susceptibility-weighted angiography shows multiple susceptibility foci, including some arranged around the central cavity (arrow). (f) Contrast-enhanced T1-WI highlights patchy, heterogeneous enhancement (arrows), with prominent enhancement of the central cavity wall.
Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates interval changes. (a) Axial T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) shows well-defined iso-to hypointense lesions in the bilateral centrum semiovale, with significant enlargement. (b) On T2-weighted imaging, the lesions remain heterogeneously hyperintense. (c) Coronal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery reveals lesion extension into the subcortical, deep, and periventricular white matter, with additional involvement of the basal ganglia and a midline shift. (d) Diffusion-weighted imaging and (e) apparent diffusion coefficient maps show persistent diffusion restriction (arrows) within the lesions. (f) Axial susceptibility-weighted imaging SWI reveals multiple susceptibility foci, some encircling the central cavity (arrows). (g) Contrast-enhanced axial and (h) coronal T1-WI demonstrate patchy, heterogeneous enhancement, including areas of ring-like enhancement (arrows).
Figure 2:
Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates interval changes. (a) Axial T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) shows well-defined iso-to hypointense lesions in the bilateral centrum semiovale, with significant enlargement. (b) On T2-weighted imaging, the lesions remain heterogeneously hyperintense. (c) Coronal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery reveals lesion extension into the subcortical, deep, and periventricular white matter, with additional involvement of the basal ganglia and a midline shift. (d) Diffusion-weighted imaging and (e) apparent diffusion coefficient maps show persistent diffusion restriction (arrows) within the lesions. (f) Axial susceptibility-weighted imaging SWI reveals multiple susceptibility foci, some encircling the central cavity (arrows). (g) Contrast-enhanced axial and (h) coronal T1-WI demonstrate patchy, heterogeneous enhancement, including areas of ring-like enhancement (arrows).

On day 4 of her admission with us, her sensorium dropped to E1VTM1 with anisocoria (right pupil > left). The NCCT head revealed an increase in edema and midline shift, following which a decompressive hemicraniectomy with dural brain biopsy was performed. KOH-calcofluor white fluorescent staining of the brain biopsy showed septate hyphae, and histopathology showed a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate [Supplementary Figures 1 and 2, respectively]. Further identification was done using the AsperGeniusTM multiplex real-time PCR assay (Pathonostics, Netherlands) on the brain biopsy, which came positive for Aspergillus fumigatus. Despite our best efforts, she succumbed to septic shock a day later.

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 2

DISCUSSION

Neurological complications of dengue can be due to neurotropism of the virus (encephalitis, meningitis, myelitis, or myositis), systemic complications of infections, or post-infectious complications.[2] Invasive fungal infections can mimic these common complications and delay antifungal agent initiation, resulting in poorer outcomes.

Singhal et al. reported three cases of invasive fungal rhinosinusitis due to Aspergillus and Mucormycosis in immunocompetent hosts recovering from dengue virus infection.[3] Sushmitha et al.[4] and Verma et al.[1] described one case each of post-dengue mucormycosis in an immunocompetent host. Lin et al. found two patients to be serum galactomannan positive among 10 dengue patients, both of whom were ultimately diagnosed with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis coexistent with dengue.[5] Altaf et al. described atypical neuroimaging of fungal infections in an immunocompetent host.[6]

Dengue virus affects macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells, altering the milieu of the host’s innate immune system. Dengue-related cytokine release leads to lymphopenia. Moreover, raised interleukin-8 levels cause thrombocytopenia and neutrophil degranulation, leading to complement and coagulation pathway activation, resulting in endothelial barrier breakdown, allowing fungal spread.[7]

CONCLUSION

Post-dengue invasive central nervous system fungal infections are being recognized in clinical practice. A high index of clinical suspicion should be considered for fungal infections in dengue patients with cytokine storm, even in immunocompetent hosts.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Emerging peril of post-dengue mucormycosis: A case report. J Acute Dis. 2023;12:35-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Neurological complications of dengue infection. Neurol India. 2010;58:581-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Invasive fungal infections in dengue recovered patients: A new phenomenon in the COVID-19 era. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):3321-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Mucormycosis in an immunocompetent patient recovering from dengue fever. Cureus. 2024;16:e65212.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Aspergillus coinfection in critically Ill patients with severe dengue. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16:1893-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Atypical radiological presentation of intracranial intra-axial fungal infection: A case report. EAS J Radiol Imaging Technol. 2020;2(2):15-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Central nervous system aspergillosis in immunocompetent patients: Case series and literature review. Medicine. 2020;99:e22911.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections