Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
6 (
3
); 405-406

Commentary

Department of Ophthalmology and Neurology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
Address for correspondence: Dr. Valerie Purvin, Department of Ophthalmology and Neurology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. E-mail: vpurvin@iupui.edu

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection that predominately affects immunocompromised patients, particularly those with diabetic ketoacidosis. The infection is typically rapidly progressive and potentially lethal due its predilection for spread along vessels with consequent thrombosis. This secondary infarction can affect the brain, causing stroke, and the orbit, producing visual loss, ophthalmoplegia and proptosis.

Infarction of the retrobulbar portion of the optic nerve is termed posterior ischemic optic neuropathy and is an uncommon event, particularly in contrast to ischemia of the optic disc.[1] The posterior portion of the optic nerve has a rich vascular supply from branches of the ophthalmic and retinal arteries with anastamoses between central and pial (peripheral) arteries, making it relatively immune to damage from vascular occlusion.

The three main settings in which we see posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) are: In the perioperative period following prolonged surgery (usually spine or heart), secondary to giant cell arteritis, and with atherosclerotic risk factors.[2] Historically, the diagnosis of PION has been a clinical one, manifest as acute visual loss not explained by ocular pathology and with a normal appearing optic disc. With advances in neuroimaging we can now confirm and further expand on this diagnosis with MRI, particularly diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Restricted diffusion on DWI, when combined with ADC mapping, is highly sensitive and specific for infarction and shows signal change within hours of onset of the ischemic event.

Restricted diffusion within the optic nerve was initially demonstrated in peri-operative PION[3] and subsequently in mucormycosis,[4] cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis,[5] thrombocytosis[6] and optic peri-neuritis.[7] Similar imaging findings in a case of lymphoma were attributed to hypercellularity due to tumor rather than infarction.[8] Infarction of the retina as well as the optic nerve has also been demonstrated in mucormycosis.[9]

DWI changes in the optic nerve in mucormycosis have been described within just a few hours of visual loss, at a time when no orbital signs were present, indicating the sensitivity of this modality.[10] Because the outcome in mucormycosis is highly dependent on prompt and aggressive treatment, any technique that allows for earlier diagnosis is valuable.

The diagnosis of rhinocerebral mucormycosis should be suspected in any immunosuppressed, debilitated or diabetic patient who develops facial or orbital pain, diplopia, orbital signs (proptosis, chemosis, lid swelling) or acute optic neuropathy. The onset of acute unilateral or bilateral visual loss with normal optic discs should prompt neuroimaging, even without these specific risk factors. CT scanning of the orbit in mucormycosis with visual loss may demonstrate enlargement and enhancement of the optic nerve, which are non-specific. Routine MRI sequences will show similar non-specific changes. The presence of restricted diffusion on DWI sequences, however, is considered specific for infarction. In the absence of a history of hypotension with blood loss or signs and symptoms of giant cell arteritis, and in the presence of the above risk factors, a diagnosis of mucor is most likely. Definitive diagnosis usually rests on pathologic examination of affected tissue but treatment can be initiated while biopsy is pending. Correction of underlying metabolic abnormalities, when possible, also affects the prognosis for recovery.

References

  1. , , , , , . Bilateral Optic Nerve Infarction In Rhino-cerebral Mucormycosis. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6:403-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Clinical spectrum of posterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:743-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Intraorbital optic nerve signal hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging sequences in perioperative hypotensive ischemic optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2005;25:202-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Acute optic nerve infarction demonstrated by diffusion-weighted imaging in a case of rhinocerebral mucormycosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:489-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Restricted diffusion in bilateral optic nerves and retinas as an indicator of venous ischemia caused by cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1815-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of bilateral simultaneous optic nerve infarctions. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:132-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . MRI demonstrates restricted diffusion in distal optic nerve in atypical optic neuritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2010;20:31-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . MRI restricted diffusion in lymphomatous optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31:306-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Restricted diffusion in the optic nerve and retina demonstrated by MRI in rhino-orbital mucormycosis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29:13-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Optic nerve thickening and infarction as the first evidence of orbital involvement with mucormycosis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012;19:340-2.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    1,663

    PDF downloads
    402
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections