Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Brief Report
16 (
3
); 435-437
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_35_2025

Biochemical and neurological changes post-COVID-19: A focus on oxidative metabolism – A case–control study

Institute of Life Sciences, Karaganda Medical University, Non-Commercial Joint Stock Company, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Rehabilitation Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
School of Dentistry, Karaganda Medical University, Non-Commercial Joint Stock Company, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.

*Corresponding author: Zeine Kulbayeva, Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Rehabilitation Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan. toleuova.zeine@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Klyuyev D, Kaliyeva S, Kulbayeva Z, Tuleutayeva S. Biochemical and neurological changes post-COVID-19: A focus on oxidative metabolism – A case–control study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2025:16:435-7. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_35_2025

Abstract

This study investigates biochemical alterations in patients recovering from COVID-19, with a particular emphasis on those experiencing persistent neurological symptoms. We compared oxidative stress markers and other biochemical indicators in post-COVID-19 individuals with those in a control group without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. The findings revealed significant shifts in oxidative and inflammatory biomarkers, especially in patients reporting neurological complaints. These alterations may underlie the persistence of such symptoms and suggest potential targets for future therapeutic interventions and diagnostic strategies.

Keywords

Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP)
COVID-19
Malonic dialdehyde (MDA)
Neurological complications
Nitric oxide (NO)
Oxidative stress
Post-COVID
Reactive carbonyl derivatives of proteins (RCDP)

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the global medical community has deepened its understanding of the long-term sequelae associated with COVID-19. While the initial focus was largely on respiratory symptoms, clinicians including those practicing in Kazakhstan have reported that a notable proportion of patients exhibit persistent neurological complications long after recovery from the acute phase of COVID-19. These include cognitive impairments, emotional instability, headaches, and sensory abnormalities.[1-7]

While several studies have addressed post-COVID-19 neurological manifestations, the underlying biochemical mechanisms remain insufficiently explored. Increasing evidence suggests that oxidative stress and systemic inflammation may contribute to nervous system dysfunction. For instance, literature data indicate elevated interleukin-6 levels in 30% of long COVID-19 cases, with C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha elevated in 15% each. Decreased hemoglobin concentrations were observed in 10% of patients. Abnormalities in cytokine/chemokine profiles and other biochemical parameters accounted for 23.9% and 39.1% of detected deviations, respectively. In addition, biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein, crucial for axonal and astrocytic integrity, have been found in peripheral blood, suggesting ongoing neurodegeneration or damage.[8]

Clinical observations in our center have similarly identified patients with otherwise unremarkable recoveries who nonetheless exhibited persistent neurological dysfunction. These observations prompted us to explore potential redox imbalances and their associations with post-COVID-19 neurological complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Karaganda Medical University (Protocol No. 18, dated April 12, 2021). Participants were randomly selected among individuals with confirmed COVID-19 infection and clinical recovery within the preceding 3–6 months. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and personal data were anonymized [Figure 1].

Graphic design of the study.
Figure 1:
Graphic design of the study.

Neurological status was assessed using standardized clinical instruments, including the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale I and II, and the composite autonomic symptom score 31. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of post-COVID-19 neurological symptoms. An additional control group consisted of 30 healthy individuals without a history of COVID-19.

Biochemical analyses included the measurement of reactive carbonyl derivatives (RCDP) using the Levine method,[9] advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) through the Witko-Sarsat technique,[10] malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide levels (quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography, Agilent). Enzymatic activity of adenosine deaminase (ADA) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) was assessed using standard assay kits (VL-MEDIA Ltd.).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using STATISTICA software (version 7.0) and Microsoft Excel. Normality was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Group comparisons were made using analysis of variance and Student’s t-test. Cluster analysis was employed to identify subgroups with similar biochemical profiles. Statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significantly elevated levels of RCDP and MDA were observed in both patient groups compared to controls, indicating increased oxidative stress. Interestingly, AOPP concentrations were lower in participants with neurological symptoms. Elevated nitrite ion levels were detected across all post-COVID-19 groups, while ADA and MPO activities exhibited variability. Cluster analysis revealed distinct biochemical patterns associated with symptom severity, particularly among those with neurological complications, highlighting notable oxidative imbalance and neutrophil activation [Figure 2].

Main clusters by indicators of blood neutrophils of the studied groups.
Figure 2:
Main clusters by indicators of blood neutrophils of the studied groups.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that certain biochemical disturbances persist well beyond the acute phase of COVID-19. Specifically, increased RCDP and nitrite ion levels in symptomatic individuals imply sustained oxidative and inflammatory processes. Concurrently, decreased AOPP and ADA activity may reflect impaired antioxidant defenses. While these findings require validation in larger cohorts, they support the hypothesis that neuroinflammation and redox imbalance play key roles in post-COVID-19 neurological syndromes.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the biochemical distinctions between post-COVID-19 patients with and without neurological symptoms, particularly in relation to oxidative stress and immune activation. These insights may aid in the development of early diagnostic tools and targeted interventions aimed at mitigating long-term neurological outcomes of COVID-19.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Karaganda medical university, number #18, dated April 12, 2021.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Neurological complications during treatment of middle east respiratory syndrome. J Clin Neurol. 2017;13:227-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Cognitive impact of COVID-19: Looking beyond the short term. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12:170.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a020412.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Psychological impact of the 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients. Compr Psychiatry. 2018;87:123-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic among the general population in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2022;13:608-17.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . The neuropsychiatric aspects of influenza/swine flu: A selective review. Ind Psychiatry J. 2011;20:83-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27:605-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Biomarkers in long COVID-19: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1085988.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Advanced oxidation protein products as a novel marker of oxidative stress in uremia. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1304-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections