Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_39_2025

Adult-onset Niemann–Pick disease type C: A diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey of a rare condition

Neurology Clinic, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
Department of Neurology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

*Corresponding author: Zeynep Ünlütürk, Neurology Clinic, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli,Turkey. zeynepunluturk@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Ünlütürk Z, Teke E. Adult-onset Niemann–Pick disease type C: A diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey of a rare condition. J Neurosci Rural Pract. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_39_2025

Abstract

Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPTC) is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder characterized by lysosomal lipid storage and progressive neurodegeneration. While NPTC typically presents in infancy or childhood, adult-onset cases pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their resemblance to common neuropsychiatric conditions. This case report describes a 34-year-old male presenting with inattention and forgetfulness, initially misdiagnosed with attention deficit and depression. His symptoms, including clumsiness and memory loss, were progressive over 8 years. Despite normal routine neurological examinations and non-specific findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging, the Neuropsychiatric Test Battery suggested organic factors affecting various cognitive functions. Genetic testing confirmed NPTC, and the patient was started on miglustat. This case underscores the importance of considering NPTC in the differential diagnosis of early-onset dementia and unexplained neuropsychiatric symptoms in adults. Early recognition and intervention with disease-modifying therapies like miglustat are crucial for improving patient outcomes. The case adds to the growing evidence that adult-onset NPTC is underrecognized and highlights the need for heightened clinical suspicion and comprehensive evaluation, including genetic testing, in patients with atypical neurological presentations.

Keywords

Lipid storage
Neurogenetics
Niemann–Pick disease type C

INTRODUCTION

Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPTC) is a rare, progressive, and fatal lysosomal lipid storage disorder. It belongs to the class of sphingolipidoses and is caused by mutations in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes, leading to autosomal recessive inheritance. This disease is characterized by disrupted endosome-lysosome lipid transport and abnormal lipid accumulation in lysosomes. The estimated incidence of all types of the disease is 1/100.000, with 95% linked to mutations in the NPC1 gene.[1] The spleen, liver, lungs, bone marrow, and brain are the organs where lipids accumulate the most.

While traditionally diagnosed in infancy or childhood, NPTC can also manifest in adults, presenting a diagnostic challenge due to its subtle and varied neurological symptoms. Adult-onset NPTC often mimics common neuropsychiatric conditions, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed therapeutic interventions. Neurological complications in adults may include cognitive impairment, ataxia, dysarthria, and psychiatric symptoms, which progressively worsen, emphasizing the need for early recognition and management.[1,2]

Adult-onset NPTC is a critical consideration in differential diagnosis for unexplained neurological and psychiatric symptoms in adults. The condition underscores the importance of comprehensive genetic screening and awareness among clinicians to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment. Miglustat, the only approved disease-modifying therapy, has shown potential in altering the course of the disease, making early diagnosis pivotal for improving patient outcomes.[1,2] As research advances, it is hoped that better diagnostic tools and treatments will emerge, offering hope to those affected by this challenging condition.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old male patient presented to the neurology clinic with inattention and forgetfulness. His complaints had been present for 2 years and were progressively worsening. He had previously consulted a psychiatry clinic and was being followed up with diagnoses of attention deficit and depression, treated with sertraline 100 mg/day and olanzapine 2.5 mg/day. Upon further investigation, it was found that he had been experiencing clumsiness and attention deficits for approximately 8 years. The patient, who did not benefit from treatment and whose complaints increased, began to forget his own phone number. His routine neurological examination was normal with no evidence of motor weakness, sensory deficits, or cerebellar signs. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed mild global atrophy without any focal lesions or white matter abnormality. Electroencephalography was normal and did not demonstrate epileptogenic activity or generalized slowing. An extensive biochemistry was requested. Routine blood biochemistry, thyroid function tests, Vitamin B12 and folate levels, and liver and renal function tests were all within normal ranges.

The neuropsychiatric test battery suggested organic factors that could lead to impairment in attention, visual– verbal memory, visual-motor functions, and frontal lobe functions. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was normal. The paraneoplastic antibody panel, autoimmune encephalitis markers, and infectious workup were all negative. In light of all these negative findings and complaints, genetic testing was pursued, and it was confirmed with Niemann–Pick disease type C. The patient was started on miglustat at a dosage of 200 mg 3 times daily. Multidisciplinary follow-up, including neuropsychological support and physiotherapy, was arranged.

DISCUSSION

Adult-onset Niemann–Pick disease type C is a rare presentation of a disease more commonly diagnosed in infancy or childhood. Its ability to mimic many neuropsychiatric diseases, presenting with a wide clinical variety including cognitive decline, learning difficulties, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, dysarthria, dysphagia, tremor, ataxia, epilepsy, psychosis, and depression, makes the disease difficult to recognize and easy to overlook.[2,3] For instance, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, a hallmark sign of NPC, may not be recognized at symptom onset, contributing to diagnostic delays.[4] Differential diagnoses to consider include Huntington’s Disease, Wilson’s Disease, Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis, Gangliosidosis, and Friedreich’s Ataxia. The absence of peripheral neuropathy and brain MRI findings other than atrophy are significant in Niemann–Pick disease type C. Our patient’s presentation with attention deficits and clumsiness, initially managed as psychiatric conditions, highlights the diagnostic challenges faced in neurology clinics due to the broad spectrum of symptoms that can be mistaken for more common disorders.

The rarity of adult-onset NPTC and the variability of its clinical presentation pose significant challenges for neurologists. Patients may present to neurology clinics with symptoms that are atypical for their age, such as cognitive impairment or unexplained neurological symptoms, which could be indicative of NPTC.[5] The absence of peripheral neuropathy and non-specific findings on brain MRI further complicate the diagnosis, as seen in our case.

Our case also underscores the importance of considering NPTC in the differential diagnosis of early-onset dementia, particularly when patients present with a combination of neuropsychiatric symptoms and a lack of clear etiology.[6-8] The identification of NPTC in such patients is crucial, as it opens the door to targeted therapies such as miglustat, which may slow disease progression and improve quality of life.[8]

A multidisciplinary approach is important in treatment. Miglustat, a competitive inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, is currently the only licensed disease-modifying treatment. It is thought to have a positive effect over 5 years of use. Miglustat has been shown to prevent irreversible neurological damage and slow/stop disease progression in some patients. Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin is a potential treatment option for Niemann–Pick disease type C.[9] In addition, a healthy, low-cholesterol diet and cholesterol-lowering medications can be beneficial in managing the disease. Nutrition, medication, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and specialist follow-up can help alleviate many symptoms.[1,2,9]

CONCLUSION

The unique aspect of the case presented here is the detailed account of the patient’s neuropsychiatric symptoms that were initially misdiagnosed as psychiatric conditions. This highlights the importance of considering NPTC in the differential diagnoses of early-onset dementia and psychiatric disorders, especially when the symptoms are atypical for the patient’s age and do not respond to standard psychiatric treatments. Our case also emphasizes the potential for misdiagnosis due to the absence of peripheral neuropathy and nonspecific findings on brain MRI, which are often relied upon in the diagnostic process. The comprehensive neuropsychiatric evaluation and the subsequent genetic confirmation of NPTC in this patient underscore the need for a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and the importance of genetic testing.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for Manuscript Preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Consensus clinical management guidelines for Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13:50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Clinical disease characteristics of patients with Niemann-Pick Disease Type C: Findings from the International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry (INPDR) Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Adult-onset Niemann-Pick disease Type C: Rapid treatment initiation advised but early diagnosis remains difficult. Front Neurol. 2017;8:108.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. A rare case of late adult-onset Niemann-Pick disease type C. J Mov Disord. 2020;13:163-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Case report: “Niemann-Pick disease type C in a catatonic patient treated with electroconvulsive therapy”. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:745734.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Late-onset Niemann-Pick disease type C overlapping with frontotemporal dementia syndromes: A case report. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019;126:1501-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Neuropsychological assessment in Niemann-Pick disease type C: A systematic review. Neurol Sci. 2021;42:3167-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Neurodegeneration in Niemann-Pick type C disease: An updated review on pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to counteract brain and cognitive impairment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6600.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections