Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
5 (
1
); 23-24

Commentary

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain

Address for correspondence: Dr. Beatriz García-Rodríguez, Facultad de Psicología, UNED Juan del Rosal, 10 28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: bgarcia@psi.uned.es

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder characterized by gait impairments and walking deficits. These deficits are exacerbated when walking is performed concurrentwith another task, a circumstance commonly studied using the Dual-Task (DT) paradigm. Usually, the introduction of a secondary task is detrimental to the performance of the primary task, causing interference in its processing.

Although multiple factors may be responsible for this, the mechanisms underlying the interference during DT walking in PD remain unclear. Such interference may be produced by certain characteristics of the individual, such as by the type of concurrent tasks or by environmental conditions. Several studieshave foundinterference ofconcurrent motor[1] and cognitive[23] tasks in DT walking, though it is unclear whether motor or cognitive tasks have a stronger impact on DT walking in people with PD.

This issue of Journal of Neuroscience in Rural Practice includes a study titled “Effect of Type of Secondary Task on Cued Gait on People with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease”.[4] The research carried out in this study aimed to compare the differential effects of concurrent motor and cognitive tasks on DT walking in people with PD. The findings suggest that the interference produced by cognitive tasks is stronger than that by motor tasks, and also provide empirical evidence of the relevance of cognition in the movement disorders associated with PD. The relevance of these results lies inthe empirical support theseprovide to the hypothesis that executive deficits characteristic of PD are caused by deficits in the ability to process information automatically, emphasizing that the control of walking is not automatic but, rather, appears to be mediated by cognitive functions.

Various hypotheses might explain the deficits in DT performance in PD patients. First, this difficulty could be caused by the motor requirements of each task. However, PD patients not only have difficulties when performingconcurrent motor and cognitive tasks, but also while performing two cognitive tasks. For example, PD patients have been found to have longer reaction times than controls when a Stroop task is executed simultaneously with a resource demanding task, indicating that PD patients have limited attentionalresources.[5] It was also suggested that multiple factors may be underlying DT interference in PD. First, the limited capacity of attentional resources is exceeded; second, PD patients perform such tasks less automatically than normal subjects; and third, central executive circuits may be affected in PD.[6 Accordingly, patients would appear to use more attentional resources for each of the simple tasks, which make it more difficult to simultaneously coordinate both tasks. While deficits in the simultaneousperformance of two motor tasks could be caused by sensorimotor interference,[7 for cognitive tasks, such interference might be caused by deficits in the central executive component responsible for distributing attentional resources.[8]

References

  1. , , . Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: Their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:110-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Effects of cognitive function on gait and dual tasking abilities in patients with Parkinson's disease suffering from motor response fluctuations. Exp Brain Res. 2011;208:169-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity and Parkinson's disease: Whichaspects of gait areattentiondemanding? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1248-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Effect of type of secondary task on cued gait on people with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2014:5.18-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Dual task performance and processing resources in normal subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1991;114:215-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Dual Task Interference in Parkinson's disease. US Neurology. 2009;5:30-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Sensorimotor disinhibition in Parkinson's disease: Effects of levodopa. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:53-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . A central executive deficit in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:360-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    405

    PDF downloads
    275
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections