Staging in giant vestibular schwannoma surgery: A two consecutive day technique for complete resection in basic neurosurgical setups

Introduction

Vestibular schwannomas constitute 8% of all intracranial tumors.[1] A majority of vestibular schwannomas are sporadic and unilateral. The incidence is highest in Asian countries and various reports suggest an incidence rate of nearly 10%.[2] Giant vestibular schwannomas (>4.0 cm in maximum diameter)[3] seen rarely in the west are seen more often in our country due to the late presentation and long duration of symptoms before diagnosis especially in socially and economically backward areas of eastern India. These giant schwannomas are challenging to manage as most of the patients have brainstem compression and score low on the karnofsky performance score.[4] It has been proven that complete tumor removal should be the goal of vestibular schwannoma surgery and maximum post-operative benefits can be expected in such cases.[5] Further, surgeries can get complicated due to incomplete hemostasis because of high tumor vascularity and indistinct planes of resection resulting in high morbidity and mortality more so with large tumors.[678] Although various surgical techniques for operating on these tumors have been described, very few have discussed staged resection in these lesions. Staged resection also may vary as per the time interval between the stages. There are studies with 1- to 2-month interval between the stages.[9] The practice of pre-operative embolization of the tumor and definitive surgery 1 to 2 months later appears to be a viable option, but due to economical and logistical constraints in our set up it is more often than not, practically unfeasible.[10] We present a series of 12 cases of giant vestibular schwannomas which were operated upon in two stages on two consecutive days in a government institute which although a tertiary referral centre for this area does lack advanced neurosurgical equipments like ultrasonic aspirator and nerve monitoring facilities. We believe that the goal of total removal of the tumor should take precedence and our technique might help other neurosurgeons in basic neurosurgical setups achieve the same.

Materials and Methods

Results

Age of the patients ranged from 36 to 68 years. There were seven (58%) male patients and five (42%) female patients. Nearly half of the patients belonged to the age group of 50 to 59 years [Table 1]. Duration of symptoms was 5 to 6 years in majority of patients. Hearing loss was the most common presenting symptom present in 12 (100%) cases followed by headache present in 10 (83%) cases. None of the patients had serviceable hearing. All patients had varying degrees of facial nerve paresis with eight patients having grade 2 paresis and four patients having grade 3 paresis. Obstructive hydrocephalus was present in all the 12 cases with clinical evidence of brainstem compression and fourth ventricle distortion present in 4 (33%) cases. Vestibular symptoms were present in eight (66%) of the cases. Three (25%) cases had pre-operative lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Trigeminal dysfunction was also present in three cases in the form of ipsilateral facial sensory loss. Cerebellar signs were seen in 50% (6 of the 12) cases at presentation. Karnofsky performance score was low for most of the cases. Almost all patients were bed ridden scoring between 50 and 70 on the index [Table 2].

Table 1 Demographic profile of the patients

Table 2 Clinical profile of the patients

Five patients had right-sided tumor and the remaining 7 had left-sided tumor. Grading of the tumors was done according to the Hannover MRI grade in case of all 12 patients. As seen in Table 3, all patients in the study were found to be having grade 4 tumors with eight patients presenting with grade T4b and four patients with grade T4a.

Table 3 Grading of the tumors on the basis of MRI

Post-operative analysis

Complete macroscopic tumor excision was done in all the cases [Figures 1 and 2]. Post-op CSF leak was not seen in any of the cases. Two patients developed post-operative meningitis which was managed by intravenous antibiotics. None of the patients developed post-op hydrocephalus presumably because they had undergone placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the pre-operative period. Two cases developed seizures in the post-operative period. There was no incidence of post-operative hematoma formation. Lower cranial nerve paralysis was seen in four (25%) cases. However, 3 of these had lower cranial nerve dysfunction in pre-operative evaluation. Pre-operatively three patients had ipsilateral facial sensory loss. It was seen in six (50%) patients in immediate post-operative period [Table 4]. Pre-operatively eight patients had House and Brackmann grade 2 facial palsy and four patients had grade 3 facial palsy. At discharge six patients had grade 2 facial palsy, four patients had grade 3 and two patients had grade 4 facial palsy. However, at 6-month follow up it was seen that six patients had grade 1 facial palsy, four patients had grade 2 palsy and two patients had grade 3 facial palsy. Trigeminal dysfunction improved over a 6-month period with only two cases having persistent facial sensory loss.

Close

Figure 1

Pre-operative MRI brain (P+C) of 32 M having left sided giant vestibular schwannomas (Hannover stage 4b)

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 2

Post-operative image of the same patient at 6 months after surgery

Export to PPT

Table 4 Post-operative complications in the patients

Serviceable hearing was present in none of the cases and post-operatively there was no improvement in hearing in any of the cases. Lower cranial nerve palsy improved in all cases at 6-month follow up. Patients with LCN palsy were fed through a Ryles tube for a prolonged period and oral feeding was started after assessment at 3-month follow-up visit. Eventually, all patients were able to have normal oral intake. The Karnofsky performance index showed improvement in all cases and most of the patients who were bed ridden at presentation were able to mobilize and take care of themselves [Table 5].

Table 5 Follow up analysis at 6 months

Discussion

In the past few years, the development of microsurgical techniques, the advent of new radiological diagnostic procedures, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has helped us achieve a better management of vestibular schwannomas.[3] The goals of surgery in case of small or medium sized tumors are preservation of facial nerve function and hearing whereas for larger lesions compressing the brainstem, the goals are radical removal with preservation of facial nerve function without additional morbidity.[16] In our setting, giant vestibular schwannomas are a very common presentation. Inadequate screening and referral systems account for delayed presentation resulting in poor prognosis. Radio surgery is not recommended for large lesions (>3.5 cm) associated with significant compression of the brainstem. These tumors usually require surgical resection.[17]

Small and medium sized tumors are often completely removed but such complete resection is much more difficult to achieve in large and giant vestibular schwannomas.[16] Incomplete excision leads to a high recurrence rate. Sasaki and associates reported recurrence rates of 29% (5 of 17 patients) and 25% (2 of 8 patients) for near-total and subtotal resection and no recurrences after total resection.[18] Most authors reported a very low recurrence rate after complete tumor excision.[14] Complete resection of these large lesions also helps us achieve maximum post-operative benefits in the form of improvement in Karnofsky performance score and overall quality of life.[16]

In our study, most of the patients were bedridden with poor KPS score at the time of presentation. In contrast to certain Western settings where signs of raised ICP and cerebellar dysfunction are rarely the presenting features,[19] many of our patients had clinical evidence of raised ICP (25%) and/or cerebellar deficits (50%) at the time of admission. It may be related to delayed presentation in our series. In our institute we do not have ultrasonic aspirator and nerve monitoring facilities. These tumors were operated with combined use of suction irrigation and bipolar coagulation. After initial arachnoid dissection internal decompression was one using bipolar coagulation and suction irrigation. After maximum internal decompression the capsule was dissected from the brainstem and cranial nerves with microdissectors. In the initial four cases the surgeon became fatigued and the operation was done in two stages on two consecutive days. After overnight elective ventilation the patients were again operated the next morning. It was observed that the tumor could be dissected easily on the next day. This could be due to overnight brain relaxation and CSF pulsation which makes the tumor superficial and easier to dissect. So in the next eight cases we deliberately operated in two stages. Complete tumor excision was achieved in all the cases. This was ensured intraoperatively by patient dissection and exposure and confirmed at follow up with a contrast MRI. Anatomical integrity of the facial nerve could not be ascertained during the surgery due to lack of monitoring equipment. Facial nerve function showed improvement by at least 1 grade over a 6-month follow-up period. Quality of life showed improvement at follow up and all the patients showed improvement in their KPS score.

In the literature there are evidence of two-stage resections for giant vestibular schwannomas but in those cases the second operation was either by a different route[9] or after a gap of at least a couple of weeks.[20] Our study is unique in the sense that the second operation was performed on the very next day and complete resection was achieved without adding any morbidity and mortality. We do accept that our study sample size is small and the lack of modern neurosurgical equipment as well as severe economic constraints on the part of patients as well as government health care setups should not define our treatment strategies. However, we would emphasize that complete resection without deterioration of facial nerve function of these giant vestibular schwannomas should be primary goal and that can be achieved in basic neurosurgical set ups.

Conclusion

Giant acoustic schwannomas can be safely resected completely by a staged resection on two consecutive days without any increased morbidity or mortality. This technique may be employed to achieve complete tumor resection in institutions which do not have advanced facilities like nerve monitoring or ultrasonic aspirator. Although there are no absolute indications for the staged resection of vestibular schwannomas, it should be considered an option for difficult cases.