Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to the Editor
6 (
4
); 633-633
doi:
10.4103/0976-3147.165435

Better assessment systems will engender better study habits

Department of BMJ Learning, BMJ Publishing Group, London, UK
Address for correspondence: Dr. Kieran Walsh, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, UK. E-mail: kmwalsh@bmjgroup.com
Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Cohen et al. should be congratulated for their study on methylphenidate use among medical students at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.[1] They have discovered findings which are fascinating and worrying at the same time. There appears to be the high usage of methylphenidate use in medical students, and many of these students are using it without a medical indication. It is likely that many students are using it to enhance performance during exams and to improve their attention and studying stamina in the days and weeks before the exam.

However, this activity should make us reflect as much on our own behavior as medical faculty as it does on the students’ behavior. In some ways, students are reacting in a rational and logical way to the pressures placed on them. Why then do we place these pressures on students – surely there are better ways to assess students than by means of end-of-term exams? Surely there are also ways to encourage healthier studying habits?

The first clear way to do this is to assess continually. Students should be assessed throughout the year – they will then be less likely to cram at the end. As faculty, we can assess their attendance at learning events, the extent of their usage of online learning resources, and their continuous progress through a curriculum.[23]

The second clear way to do this is to assess more than just knowledge and thus cognition. Students need more than just a bank of knowledge to become good doctors – they need communication and team-working skills and procedural skills.[4] They need healthy attitudes to their patients and colleagues. They need to practice ethical and professional behaviors. Only a continuous and rounded assessment system will enable us to know when if and when students have achieved these outcomes. Moreover, using methylphenidate will not help them achieve any of these outcomes.

It is not surprising that the current system of assessment is encouraging unwanted behaviors – and it is only by changing the system that we will in turn change these behaviors.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , . Methylphenidate use among medical students at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6:320-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . A systemic framework for the progress test: Strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No 71. Med Teach. 2012;34:683-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . High users of online continuing medical education: A questionnaire survey of choice and approach to learning. Med Teach. 2010;32:83-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Progress testing: Is there a role for the OSCE? Med Educ. 2014;48:623-31.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections