Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
3 (
1
); 54-55

Commentary

Division of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
Address for correspondence: Dr. Aaron Mohanty, Division of Neurosurgery, 301 University Boulevard, Rt 0517, Galveston, TX, 77555-0517, USA. E-mail: aarmohanty@yahoo.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

In the pediatric population, oligodendrogliomas constitute around 2% of all primary intracranial tumors. Brain stem oligodendrogliomas are very uncommon and only limited information is available in the literature. It is difficult to establish the incidence of true intrinsic brain stem oligodendrogliomas in the pediatric population considering its rarity. Alvarez et al. in an analysis of 1593 oligodendrogliomas and 307 brain stem mass lesions reported in the literature from 1933 to 1996 had 56 posterior fossa oligodendrogliomas. Of these 56, only six could be considered as intrinsic brain stem tumors, 10 others were exophytic tumors in the fourth ventricle and the remaining 40 were located in the posterior fossa with infiltration of the cerebellum and brain stem accompanied by wide dissemination along the subependymal and subarachnoid pathways.[1] As the authors in the present communication[2] have indicated, it is at times difficult to determine the site of the tumor origin as most of the reports were from the pre-magnetic resonance imaging days. Of all the brain stem locations, pons and medulla appear to be the most common locations. The tumor often invades the midbrain, with rostral spread, as demonstrated in prior reports[3] and in the present report.[2] Exophytic masses tend to arise from the dorsal brain stem in the region of the tegmentum and expand into the fourth ventricle. Infiltration along the white matter tracts and spread along the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) often indicated that these lesions are more aggressive than once thought in the past. The tumors have a propensity to spread along the subarachnoid pathways.[4]

Unlike their supratentorial counterparts, these tumors manifest with a relatively short clinical course, possibly due to their location. Being in close proximity to the major long tracts and nuclei of the cranial nerves and the CSF pathways, these tumors present earlier in their clinical course. Additionally, some believe that posterior fossa oligodendrogliomas biologically behave more aggressively, accounting for the earlier presentation. The tumors have been reported to be more frequently cystic and are less calcified. Surgical biopsy and, in appropriate cases, microsurgical excision, has been advocated. Radiation therapy has been used in the postoperative period to slow the recurrence of the tumor. Leptomeningeal metastasis is often observed in the follow-up period. The overall prognosis may not be as bleak as suggested in the previous reports.[12]

References

  1. , , , . Primary intrinsic brainstem oligodendroglioma in an adult. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:1165-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Pediatric brainstem oligodendroglioma. J Neurosc Rural Pract. 2012;3:52-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Oligodendrogliomas of the fourth ventricle: Report of two cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1969;32:226-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Disseminated oligodendrogliomas. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1945;54:274-9.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    868

    PDF downloads
    246
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections